Tehdastehdas

joined 1 year ago
[–] Tehdastehdas@lemmy.world 1 points 29 minutes ago* (last edited 5 minutes ago)

Motorway noise won't be reduced by electrification.

Urban planning won't be improved.

Heavy metal pollution will be reduced.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1352231012006942

As, Hg and Se exhaust emissions were dominated by fuel combustion while Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn exhaust emissions were dominated by lubricant oil combustion.

Microplastic pollution will increase.

[–] Tehdastehdas@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

We're making the same mistake with AI as we did with cars; not planning human future.

Cars were designed to atrophy muscles, and polluted urban planning and the air.
AI is being designed to atrophy brains, and pollutes the air, the internet, public discourse, and more to come.

We should change course towards AI that makes people smarter, not dumber: AI-aided collaborative thinking.
https://www.quora.com/Why-is-it-better-to-work-on-intelligence-augmentation-rather-than-artificial-intelligence/answer/Harri-K-Hiltunen

[–] Tehdastehdas@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

If you consider it as an attack, it makes sense. Same with Xitter and OkCupid.

[–] Tehdastehdas@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

The stricter it's "controlled", the more out of control the black market is.

[–] Tehdastehdas@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

San Francisco has spent so much money trying to solve the fentanyl crisis and yet it still persists.

[–] Tehdastehdas@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Your robot vacuum cleaner will shred it and put it in the trash.

[–] Tehdastehdas@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The Ipcress File

The Man Who Would Be King

The War Lord

Panic in Year Zero

Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb
or the more serious counterpart:
Fail Safe

Colossus: The Forbin Project

Threads (1984) - not so old, but belongs here with those other nuclear war films.

The Andromeda Strain

[–] Tehdastehdas@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Because it's good now, bad later. Junkies crave good now.

[–] Tehdastehdas@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I recently installed /e/OS on my phone. It's based on Lineage OS, which is based on AOSP.
Bank apps work.
Battery lasts a week in sparse use.

Its main feature is privacy, tracker blocker pictured:

Comparison of Android-based Operating Systems

 
  • Visionaries:
    Vannevar Bush
    Douglas Engelbart
    Alan Kay
    Ted Nelson
    Bret Victor

versus

  • Regressives
 

I received mail from eures.europa.eu to Gmail for years before Google’s new “be evil” act.

Ban Google in EU. Don’t let citizens use enemy services in a cold war.

 
  • Visionaries:
    Vannevar Bush
    Douglas Engelbart
    Alan Kay
    Ted Nelson
    Bret Victor

versus

  • Regressives
 

I was horrified by the contents of one of my Finnish mutual funds when I looked into it after years of disinterest: USA is overweighted, and I hate some of those companies I've ended up owning.

I'm especially disgusted by UnitedHealth Group Inc - the health insurance company whose mass murderer CEO got shot recently, sparking nationwide cheers.

As a passive investor, you'll forget your money into the wrong hands when the bank won't remind you of developments in the political situation.

Ålandsbanken promises:

"socially sustainable"

You may assume your bank is civilised, but you should have a closer look. I'm a customer of S-bank in Finland. In this case, the fund ended up under a different bank twice due to buyouts, and the management of the fund ended up in a Canadian bank branch in the UK.

My other bank didn't recommend selling my Russian investment when Putin's reign had started going overdue after his full term as a president. Luckily I was awake and sold everything.

Investments drift out of balance over time. Within mutual funds, there are limits, but the funds grow at different rates. You should re-balance your diversification once in a while to avoid excessive country risk.

I don't know if fund managers are bribed to distort the balance within the fund's limits for the benefit of a third party.

My fund is managed by that guy. I sold everything. Will reinvest in Europe.


How should you invest?

Profit comes with risk.

high risk, high reward (on average)

Don't take more risk than you can carry. For example, if you'll surely need at least 100% of your money back in a few years, don't put all of that money into stock (shares), because they are unpredictable in the short term.

In the stock market, even the duration of a "short term" is unpredictable. For example, if you invested in Japan right before the 1980s bubble burst, you would have had to wait 20 years to recover from the crash.

Japan bubble peak 1990

Owning your house is an undiversified, unhedged investment in real estate. What if there’s a bubble about to burst? What if the house is hit by a disaster that insurance won’t cover? If I owned a house, I’d probably take some debt and buy foreign shares not related to house prices.

Easiest way to invest safely:
Hire a fiduciary to craft a passive (cheap) investment strategy suited to your needs. My bank offers free advice for crafting a strategy.
(Don't buy actively managed funds with costly fees - it's a waste of money, except in a few special cases. The bank will happily sell you an expensive service.)

Easy way to invest somewhat ethically:
Put your money into ESG-compliant or highly EU SFDR-rated index funds (with really cheap fees) that don't invest in countries, industries, and companies you disapprove of.
(In some cases, switching between funds in the same bank allows you to avoid paying taxes from your previous winnings in the fund you want to get rid of, because the sell/buy -action is interpreted as an internal move.)

More ethical easy way to invest:
If the “responsible” ESG-labeled funds are too lax for your thirst for good, find a tailored fund / bespoke portfolio where you can set tighter criteria for ethical behaviour.

Do it yourself the right way:
Buy shares of companies you approve of - the most ethical companies trying to stay clean in a dirty economy. Makers of wind turbines, solar panels, batteries, cable, bicycles, electric vehicles (trains and trams!), sustainable forestry, etc.
It's easy nowadays through many banks’ websites. Upkeep cost can be minimal.
A lazy strategy:
Store your money in various low risk financial instruments.
Once in every ~5 years, invest part of your savings in a diversified portfolio of 30 companies (and other high risk financial instruments) in at least 10 countries on at least 2 continents in at least 3 unrelated industries, and forget for 5 years.
Be sure to diversify in time by buying at different times to avoid accidentally investing everything on top of a global bubble.
If you’re feeling extra active, maybe prefer to buy in a depression and sell on a bubble, but you can't predict the future any better than all the other investors trying to outsmart you. Price/earnings ratio measures investor optimism that bubbles are made of.
Between investment sprees, save into a regular savings account.

Types of risk relevant in diversification and hedging:

If all your investments are subject to the same type of risk, they could crash at the same time.

Avoid participating in disaster capitalism with a moral hazard where companies doing disaster recovery cause disasters to pump up their share value.

If you think a company isn’t enriched by you buying previously issued, pre-owned, existing shares from someone else on the market, you're wrong, because the company sees the increased demand on the market and issues more shares, making more money from investors after you. Same as when you buy a stolen item, the thief reacts to increased demand by stealing another one.

If you think donating to charities is more ethical than investing, I somewhat disagree: it's good, but it's also unsustainable. You can grow more charity power by growing money in benefit corporations that are effectively profit-seeking charities. Example: Mozilla.

I think crypto money is a waste of computation that could be used for something productive, like protein folding. That said, Wikipedia: Proof of stake # Energy consumption:

In 2021, a study by the University of London found that in general the energy consumption of the proof-of-work based Bitcoin was about a thousand times higher than that of the highest consuming proof-of-stake system ... Ethereum's switch to proof-of-stake was estimated to have cut its energy use by 99%.


(This post was originally in You Should Know. It was justly deleted for pushing an agenda, which is banned there. Thanks for all the comments that led me to write the above investment guide.)

 

Wikipedia: Verojärjestelmä # Veronalennuksien vaikutus verotuottoon

Vuonna 2020 tehdyssä London School of Economicsin julkaisemassa tutkimuksessa ei löytynyt näyttöä siitä, että rikkaille kohdennetut veronalennukset lisäisivät talouskasvua tai työllisyyttä. Tutkimus perustui kahdeksantoista OECD-maan tietoihin 50 vuoden ajalta.

 

Kauan omistamani rahaston painotus näyttää järkyttävältä, kun katson sitä ensimmäistä kertaa vuosiin. Erityisesti pistää silmään UnitedHealth Group Inc, jonka kirjoituspöytämurhaaja-toimitusjohtaja tuli ammutuksi äskettäin, ja kansa hurrasi.

Passiivisena sijoittajana omat rahat unohtuvat vääriin käsiin, kun pankki ei muistuttele maailmanpoliittisen tilanteen muuttumisesta.

"Ålandsbankenin vastuullisen sijoittamisen periaatteet"

Tämä rahasto perityi S-Pankille sen ostaessa pankkeja, jotka olivat ostaneet pankkeja. Rahaston hoitajaksi päätyi kanadalaisen pankin sivukonttori UK:ssa.

Toinen pankkini ei suositellut Venäjä-rahaston myyntiä Putinin kauden mentyä pitkäksi. Onneksi tajusin myydä osuuteni silloin.

Sijoitukset ajautuvat epätasapainoon ajan mittaan. Rahastojen sisällä on rajat epätasapainolle, mutta rahastot kasvavat epätahtiin. Välillä kannattaa tasapainottaa hajautus vaihtamalla rahasto-osuuksia sopivasti, ettei maariski kasva sietämättömäksi.

En tiedä lahjotaanko rahastonhoitajia painotuksen vääntämiseksi sääntöjen puitteissa tiettyyn laitaan ulkopuolisen tahon eduksi.

Rahastoni hoitaja on kuka lie. Myin pois. Sijoitan Eurooppaan.


Sama englanniksi, ja lisäksi sijoitusneuvoja: https://feddit.uk/post/24222258

 

Black box feed shaping is sneaky propaganda, making undesirable messages effectively unseen. We shouldn't submit to it, or give credence to it.

European citizens' media feeds in the control of a hostile country enables the slow, strategic destruction of Europe by trillions of unnoticeable manipulations.

 

Every time Windows updates itself, my Linux disappears. Actually, it's just hidden, only the boot menu was overwritten. You need a computer maintenance technician to make a new boot menu. I use a USB stick with a live Linux with automatic boot repair tools.

Recently, Windows has become resistant to Boot Repair Disk. Now I have to open computer firmware by tapping "Esc" right after power-up, then select "Boot options", then "Linux".


EU must ban all US-made smart products for its own safety. All closed-source software and electronics that can be used for strategic manipulation and sabotage -- Google, Apple, Amazon, all of it.

We have functional, clunky open-source software that could easily be fitted for any purpose with the money we waste propping up foreign monopolies sabotaging us. Europe has taken a huge risk. I suspect bribery.

 

The destruction of OkCupid by Match Group looks like a politically motivated attack against the minorities and intellectual power users who used to flock there.

OkCupid used to be the best place to match diverse people.
They crowdsourced thousands of multiple choice questions from which you built your search filter:

  • Which answers you accept
  • How important each is to you
  • Your answer for the other side of the match equation
  • Voluntary explanation

The match results were factored into friendship, dating, and sex. "Friendship" contained ethics and communication style, so it also worked for business partnerships.

Then Match Group bought it.
For a while they let it be, but then they:

  • Removed the factoring - no more looking for friends or sex, only complete packages
  • Removed search - no more finding the best matches anywhere on the planet, now you just swipe like Tinder
  • Removed keyword search - no more finding niche interests not included in the questions, like "furry"
  • Removed the search filter - now everything has to be the same to match: both of you must have or not have tattoos for example, never mind what you like - two of my likes went from 99% and 95% to 50% match
  • Deleted the voluntary explanations without warning, so no one could back theirs up
  • Deleted ~95% of the match questions without warning
  • Deleted all message histories
  • Deleted all accumulated likes, which were the best matching people around the world with maximal couple/friend/sex partner potential except, for example, location for now. They broke the profile links, so bookmarks became useless.
  • They delete likes without permission, without notification
  • They delete matches (mutual likes) if they haven't been messaging in a while, as if that meant they're not a match - no, they have a temporary problem, such as life situation
  • They block previously matched people that have been clicked "pass" on without notifying either party about the blocking. People have appeared on my block list (well hidden under "settings") even when I wasn't using the site.
  • They show profile sections in the wrong order, so those written as a continuum won't make sense. After liking and reopening the profile, the sections will be shown in the correct order.
  • They police inconvenient statements in the users' introductions as the political situation evolves - the day after the mass murderer healthcare insurance CEO got shot, the section in my profile containing (for months) "fuck the healthcare system - make a better one" was deleted without sending me a copy to edit

Plausibly deniable attack: "It's just business."

Avoid dating services owned by Match Group.

 

It cheats you in through a back door, looking like an ad-covered kiosk. The main entrance is on the other side.

In stalls, there are two screens playing ads, sound coming from the one you're facing.

Toilet paper brands advertise on dispensers, all brands owned by the same conglomerate.

Softest toilet paper has printed portraits of the toilet company's political enemies.

Facial recognition measures usage, you pay at exit.

Exiting after 5 minutes is expensive, but a monthly plan is cheaper.

 

The whole wash was estimated 72 minutes when it started.

It weighs the clothes by inertia in the beginning, I didn't overload, and the water (hot and cold) comes in fast through thick pipes, so there's no excuse for this.

How dumb must the program be to estimate one minute left in the beginning of the rinse cycle with two rinses and a spin cycle to go?

The building and presumably the machine were made 2018, and the maintenance log on the side says many repairs have been made since, so the software must have been updated many times already.

view more: next ›