TreadOnMe

joined 4 years ago
[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I honestly think that Perot (whose politics outside of his anti-war stance are just as idiotic and self-serving as every other politicians) gave the DNC and the RNC enough of a scare to lock everything down and ensure that a third party would never even taste national election success again.

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 23 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (5 children)

Lol no they don't. Rhetoric chases people's votes, the material outcomes are predetermined by the systems of capital ownership, because the solicitation of donations is still the largest determinate of election outcome (outside of incumbency). Regardless if you win or lose, you have to enact policies that benefit your donors, or potential future donors, and given that we are living in the largest historical wealth gap, the material interests of politicians is to rhetorically chase the populace, but actually enact policies that only benefit the wealthy.

As you have so aptly demonstrated, the absolutely piss-poor political education that people in the U.S. receive insures that we will continue to be taken on the ride again and again.

Also, we don't need to use any thought to reply to you, when you demonstrate so little insight.

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 21 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

And they still never got compensated properly lol

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

So Gavin is a California Democratic party machine baby. Which means that he is essentially a Republican, but used to say he felt bad about having to dispossess the homeless, and won't outright say that trans people need to shut and commit suicide already. And this is besides cozying up to literal techno-fascists.

On the dimly bright-side, the California Democratic party machine is a very different animal (because California is essentially it's own country) than the DNC/DC party machine. For example, while many DNC-based Democrats are very heavy on their China-bad rhetoric, Newsom is not because California thrives off of trade with China. Besides the fact that California is loathed by the populace of almost every other state (for good and bad reasons), that would be the only other reason they wouldn't choose him, because he does have his own independent power base that exists outside of the DNC circle-jerk.

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 22 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As per usual, Natalie is just upset that our old white men (including Mao) are better than her old white men.

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 32 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Knowing where the funding for foreign NGO's comes from is still a good idea, regardless of the affects on the rights of LGBTQ people, which you can pretend is inherent, but it's not. The primary contradiction is still imperialism, not gay rights. It's a shame that they are the political football, but wanting to know where the money is coming from will never be a bad decision for a government to make.

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 8 points 11 months ago

This is some illiterate bullshit. If you listen to the rhetoric on both sides, they are literally both claiming that if they don't win, then fascism wins and it's the end of American democracy.

Nobody is even thinking about 'will fascism take thirty cents off my eggs'.

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 24 points 11 months ago

Ah yes, the known liar definitely wouldn't have lied about what she would do while in office.

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's more complex than that. It is the idea that, because we are all equal before the law (as opposed to before where legal privileges were inherited, bought and sold) those that have more have earned it righteously and are therefore liberated in their ability to negotiate contracts with other citizens. This, of course, is nonsense thought from a historical materialist standpoint, but from an idealist standpoint it makes total sense.

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yeah, there are a million lib essays on fascism that don't understand that there is a material root to fascism and it's contradictions. They get so caught up on 'authoritarianism' usually though, and get into comparing Mussolini, Stalin and Hitler, which gets them way off course.

The real key as well, imo, is to study the rise of Japanese fascism, because it mirrors the rise of fascism in Italy and Germany, but it does it without having a singular massive 'authoritarian' leader (because that is not how the histories of Asian people are written in the West). It's a little different because it was a continuation of the Imperial system, but you will notice that, for the most part, the Emperor himself was not a singular driving force, but that it was a collective emerging capitalist/noble class decision. It really drives home the idea that fascism is just when you are on the pointy end of capitalism.

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 38 points 11 months ago

"If Biden is a patriot..." Christ Almighty, imagine being so cooked that you think the elites think in the same stupid way that they have convinced the plebs to.

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, there is very little incentive to do well. Especially for U.S. graduate and doctoral students. Even if you do do very well, the best thing that will happen for most of them if they stay in the U.S. is that they will be taken and paid alot of money to not do research for the competition, because no-one really works on anything interesting anymore. All of the cool chemistry and industrial technologies stuff comes from China and Europe.

The problem is that the assumption is that if you had to go do a doctorate, you weren't smart (or connected) enough to dropout and become an entrepreneur. It's a really really bad system that creates huge disincentives from learning about things and pushing the boundaries of what is possible. Instead it the incentive is to learn how to do marketing and graft better.

view more: ‹ prev next ›