Zonetrooper

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Zonetrooper@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

(Engineering)

According to movies:

  1. We spend our entire workdays in the lab.

  2. Whenever anything is turned on, there's a loud whirring and a big shower of sparks. Computer screens with big flashing "WARNING!" signs are optional.

  3. Something is inevitably spinning on the lab bench. It's unclear if it does anything.

  4. Fixing a major problem is solved when someone has an "Ah-hah!" brainstorm moment, wires up something on the spot, and it magically works perfectly.

  5. Assembling a new thingymajig involves lots of power tools and pieces which fit together seamlessly. If they don't fit, they can be made to fit with some elbow grease and definitely won't fail horribly the first time you turn them on.

  6. Labs are festooned in such random pieces of hazardous equipment as high-voltage power lines, random chemicals, blowtorches, and radioactive materials.

In reality, we spend a lot of our days at our desks, the equipment is surprisingly quiet (and that which isn't, you stay well away from while it is operating), and spinny stuff largely went away in the 1980s. Assembling a new thing is 30 minutes of grumbling, 3 hours of pulling your hair out, and day(s) of waiting for a new part because someone screwed up tolerances or signal polarity. The most dangerous thing in the lab is stuff sloppily left laying on the floor, which I have tripped over and nearly cracked my skull before.

In fairness, #4 happens sometimes. It's extremely rare, but occasionally you do get those moments where you figure out what the bug in the system is and can rectify it in an hour or two. Most of the time, a fast fix for one problem causes another.

[–] Zonetrooper@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

The only problem with reading the Manga is that after you finish it, the film seems so simplistic and flat in comparison. The Manga has so much greater nuance, tragedy, and depth to it.

[–] Zonetrooper@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

This. I don't understand why murdering your alt-self is "necessary". Wouldn't you actually want to preserve your alternate-self at all costs, to ensure you can continue to make return trips?

The real issue here is that - if your home reality works by the same rules - once you leave it, you can never return home ever, because no alternate version of yourself exists in the one you originated from after you leave it.

Before you say "hey, that sounds awesome, this place sucks!", consider that finding a better reality is not guaranteed.

[–] Zonetrooper@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Finally, another "No magic zombies" person!

What are your thoughts on a "28 X Later" style scenario? Where the they're still subject to injuries/starvation/etc, and the risk is more due to the sheer speed of the infected, ability to ignore pain in the short term, and asymptomatic carriers of the disease?

[–] Zonetrooper@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

"...scientists can't explain."

This kind of headline is infuriating to me, and I really expect better from a media outlet like the BBC. It betrays a fundamental failure to honestly discuss science as a constant process of learning. Just because don't have an answer today doesn't mean it can't be explained, only that it isn't currently explained.

[–] Zonetrooper@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, I like my giant robot fights to have some decent story and characters too, y'know? The grey, gritty, grounded portrayal of war is what makes me a gundam fan over other mecha series.

But yeah, in this case, the gorgeous mecha animation at the very least balances out the basic writing.

[–] Zonetrooper@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

CAD options also flow over to the whole GPU debate as well. Yes, Nvidia's company practices are awful. Yes, I'd love to have more options. But this doesn't change that most of the heavyweight CAD options out there don't play well with non-Nvidia GPUs.

I'd love it if there were FOSS / GPU-agnostic CAD options. But until then, focusing on what works is important, y'know?

[–] Zonetrooper@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Pretty much. Writing is mediocre but not awful, mobile suits (and all the machinery, really) are A+, human animations are awful.

[–] Zonetrooper@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not sure what they're on about that the story and protagonist are "no good"?

Like, I'll admit the writing is pretty basic and blunt. Characters are shallow and nobody really has time to develop. But apart from like, one moment, nothing really made me upset? I'd still give it a mid/10.

[–] Zonetrooper@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

You know those people who restore old machinery and equipment? Locomotives, historic warships, industrial sites and so on? I'd absolutely be dedicating my day to that. There's something so satisfying about seeing that old stuff work, but they're always chronically understaffed and struggling to keep up with everything.

Oh, and write a novel.

[–] Zonetrooper@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Okay, but how are we rating them, not against what?

In other words, is this question "Who is more skillful than who?" or "Who is better-written than who?", or "Who do I just personally like better than who?"

[–] Zonetrooper@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Thanks! I remembered that Zeon ships were noted to store their suits in whatever orientation was most efficient (since gravity wasn't a concern) while the Earthnoid-built Federation ships mostly stored them "upright" relative to atmospheric operation. I'd forgotten that 0083 had them launching like that as well.

I also take your point about accuracy, but ships being attacked at very short range also seems to be a fairly common thing. Seems to be at least once a series a suit gets no more than a few hundred meters from a ship, sometimes even straight into boarding/melee range.

 

Most warships we see launch mobile suits "horizontally" (i.e., in the direction the suit would faces when standing).

I'm curious if we've ever seen a mobile suit launch "vertically" (i.e., 'head" or "feet" first)? Obviously this wouldn't work for any earth-bound warships, but for spacegoing ones it'd be fine. In theory, this would allow vulnerable catapult doors to be far smaller launching "face-forward".

 

For some people, it's a fictional technology that is detailed down to the very nuts and bolts. For others, a fictional culture that has all its elements seamlessly knit together to create a complex tapestry. A history that deftly tells the story of a person, nation, or planet, or an otherworldly species that feels real enough that it could exist, if only in another world.

What is it for you? What examples in fiction stood out for you? Why did they do; what about them spoke to you so strongly? It could be widely-known published fiction, or some niche project you ran into on the internet once.

 

After nearly a decade of unbelievable service, and with price increases likely on the horizon, it's finally come time to retire my old desktop.

After some analysis, here's what I've settled on:

PCPartPicker Part List

Type Item Price
CPU AMD Ryzen 7 7700X 4.5 GHz 8-Core Processor $250.00
CPU Cooler Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 SE 66.17 CFM CPU Cooler $39.90 @ Amazon
Motherboard Gigabyte B650 GAMING X AX V2 ATX AM5 Motherboard $179.99 @ Amazon
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws S5 64 GB (2 x 32 GB) DDR5-6000 CL30 Memory $189.99 @ Newegg
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 1 TB M.2-2280 PCIe 4.0 X4 NVME Solid State Drive $0.00
Storage Western Digital Red Pro 2 TB 3.5" 7200 RPM Internal Hard Drive $0.00
Video Card Gigabyte WINDFORCE OC GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 16 GB Video Card $799.99 @ Amazon
Case Lian Li LANCOOL 216 ATX Mid Tower Case $94.00 @ Newegg Sellers
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA 850 GT 850 W 80+ Gold Certified Fully Modular ATX Power Supply $109.99 @ Amazon
Prices include shipping, taxes, rebates, and discounts
Total $1663.86
Generated by PCPartPicker 2024-11-13 19:11 EST-0500

Some quick explanations on decision making:

  • Primary usage is a mix of gaming and CAD / 3D modeling / rendering.

  • After Intel shit the bed one too many times, I'm definitely taking an AMD CPU. I could be convinced to go to the 7600X3D, but there seems to be a noticeable dropoff on non-gaming tasks, such as 3D modeling, and some debate about the viability of a 6-core CPU going forward.

  • The two hard drives are listed as $0 because I already own them, and will be transferring them into this unit.

  • 850W power supply should give me ample room for overclocking, adding future components, while still staying under that 80% load limit.

Open questions / things I'm uncertain on:

  • CPU Cooler: I've heard that Ryzens can run hot, but I'm unsure if I need such a beefy one. For a 7700X, is it too much?

  • RAM: Is 64GB a lot? Yes. RAM shortages plagued me until I brought my current machine up to 48GB. I thought 64 would carry me forward with room to spare. Is this silly?

  • Went with a 4070 Ti Super for the 16GB RAM. Is it too much GPU for the rest of this rig?

Now, here's my big question: Micro Center nearby me is running combo deals for a 7700X or 7600X3D, Gigabyte or Asus motherboard, and 32GB RAM. Looking at what I'm trying to build, does that make sense? Would upgrading to 64GB with 4 sticks later be a problem?

view more: next ›