adeoxymus

joined 2 years ago
[–] adeoxymus@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

lol @ “Out of context cats”, as if context would explain the behavior.

[–] adeoxymus@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Has she lived outside the country before? Do you want to go somewhere else with her? If she wants to stay close to family why not try Canada? It’s close by, similar climate and time zone and culturally not that different from the north east.

[–] adeoxymus@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Officially wouldn’t this be the normal usage of we? In royal we it would mean “I” right?

[–] adeoxymus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Alright thanks! so it means you’re showing RTT theoretical/RTT actual? That makes sense!

[–] adeoxymus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Super cool plot! Few questions, I was trying to read the scale bar. It says RTT/(1-(2*distance/c)). I guess that’s a typo? otherwise I’m not sure what it would mean.

Then the scaling goes up to 10, did you multiply by 10 or did you inverse the values? (Inverting would mean higher values = lower connectivity? which I guess is possible in Europe if we have to consider the routing ?).
Also it’s very interesting how uniform the whole American continent is.

[–] adeoxymus@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

To add to this, how you evaluate the students matters as well. If the evaluation can be too easily bypassed by making ChatGPT do it, I would suggest changing the evaluation method.

Imo a good method, although demanding for the tutor, is oral examination (maybe in combination with a written part). It allows you to verify that the student knows the stuff and understood the material. This worked well in my studies (a science degree), not so sure if it works for all degrees?

[–] adeoxymus@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (7 children)

Cool I’m super interested in the result. I’m marking the post!

Edit: I also love the visualizations, didn’t make that clear in first reply 🫣

[–] adeoxymus@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (16 children)

Could you calculate shortest distance to each point (using for example haversine formula) and then divide each time you got by 2*distance/c to get some sort of normalized score for connectivity? Anything closely approaching 1 would be the optimal connectivity to that destination.

Edit: c would be speed of light

[–] adeoxymus@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Tbh it would be really useful to see all the years before 2015 to see if there’s a trend

[–] adeoxymus@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

It’ll come back to you..

Probably next time you’re without your phone. Alone. On a bus. With your stop coming up. And an important meeting awaiting there. No stress.

[–] adeoxymus@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

OMG of course! Thanks :-)

[–] adeoxymus@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago (14 children)

Help I don’t get it :-(

 

Since recently OpenAI have introduced custom instructions where you can provide specific details and guidelines for chats (see https://openai.com/blog/custom-instructions-for-chatgpt )

What have you used?

At first I added a lot, but I toned it down because I felt chatGPT would sometimes focus on that unnecessarily.

Now I only have my country and languages, and I have requested any answers to be in metric units. That last one is very useful when I ask for recipes, before it would talk about Fahrenheits and Ounces and what not. Now I at least get Celcius, milliliters and grams!

I also added that it should reply as an expert in the field with a casual tone. Which causes it to go "aah, the old ..... problem" whenever I ask it for debugging help :D

 
view more: next ›