I bring my phone. I likely won't be breaking any laws, and I can afford a lawyer. So yeah arrest me and waste the system's time. Just another data point they have to sort.
And if it gets to the point where none of that matters we were cooked anyway
I bring my phone. I likely won't be breaking any laws, and I can afford a lawyer. So yeah arrest me and waste the system's time. Just another data point they have to sort.
And if it gets to the point where none of that matters we were cooked anyway
I'm actually hoping the bigger fish keep the population under control.
Otherwide I'm planning to heavily plant and add some wood pieces. Including a section of cholla wood. I used that years ago when I had a tank and the shrimp used to successfully hide
In the past I successfully kept a betta and danios in a planted tank together. They existed pretty peacefully.
I figured with even more room and with gourami being faster than the betta they could exist peacefully.
I'm open to other suggestions for species, but i do intend to have a variety.
It can be an expensive hobby.
Oh absolutely. I'm not new to the hobby, but I'm getting back into it after many years. Inflation has of course made everything more. I also learned how rare and expensive marimo moss balls are now :(
I'm planning to do white play sand, washed multiple times of course.
As for gourami aggressiveness my research suggested that Pearl Gourami are more peaceful than blue dwarf.
The plan is to heavily plant the tank with various species, but I haven't even begun to think about those species. Which is ironic since they will go in well before the fish.
What do you mean by microfauna? I can't think of any species much smaller than shrimp.
Tell me about one of your setups
They do not decide who is allowed to run for office though and independents can and do win races.
And frankly the last thing I want to do is change the system to create more private organizations like political parties.
I hear where you are coming from, but the law descends from the will of the people or at least it should.
Allowing a body independent from government oversight decide who is allowed to be a lawyer and therefore a judge is a terrible idea though. Currently each state has an independent BAR association that decides who can and cannot practice law within the state. Handing over full judiciary control to a private organization like that is a terrible idea.
That's creating a body of government not controlled by the people at all. I don't like that.
If there was a recall process then maybe
On the flip side if people bring their partners and children I think it emphasizes the intent to protest peacefully and deflated the rhetoric the right is trying to build
Elected officials appointing judges to serve a term with a limit on the number of terms seems the best option imo.
The fact the Dems haven't kicked him out of the party is insane
I doubt they will find anything of use. The most powerful thing I can do is slow them down. It's the best use of my privilege