axx

This is idiotic. If being rich makes you inherently bad, then it's a highly curable condition: make them not rich. Remove their money (and all access to it via secondary means).

But don't try to justify killing people you apparently simply want to kill with flimsy logic.

But really, neither of these are realistic, they are both overly simplistic solutions to what is a systemic problem which requires a systemic solution.

What up you decrepit shit magnets?

The main advantage of NixOS containers, to my limited understanding, is that since they are built by Nix, all dependencies are updated with nixpkgs (no woefully out of date stuff in one of the layers of the container image) and you can pin these if you need to.

I'd like to understand the differences and similarities between the two better too though.

I think they know. I think we are realising these people are eugenicists.

C'est quoi "les wokes" ?

On what grounds is the terrorism charge constructed? Seriously.

Must, not should. I was going to say "if he's innocent, killing him is murder" but actually, even if he isn't it still is.

No, he does not care at all. Nope. Doesn't care about what the media says. No bearing, none.

Not really. Do you know how many proprietary, company-specific extensions and modules there are of the Linux kernel out there?

Loads of companies choose not to contribute their stuff back upstream. I don't know why the NSA did originally in the case of SELinux, but I would guess it had to do with transparency, national defense and not carrying the burden of a module / fork solo. They were also not the only contributors even early on, according to the Wikipedia page

Also, if I recall correctly, there was no other option for MAC back them (no AppArmor or Tomoyo).

I have a feeling this is just looking for a clever way to say "but Linux isn't as secure as everyone thinks", which sure, yes. But also, not many people, especially knowledgeable people, are claiming that Linux is "secure".

And when it comes to "privacy friendly" that depends so much on what flavour of Linux you are using (Ubuntu? a minimal Arch? Tails?) that it's not really something you can make broad statements about.

This is a poor fake. The "richest man in the world" has missing front teeth? Sure.

It could also be, simply, that she's a lying bastard.

It's pretty clear from the few mentions of her positions in the article that she has at best a very superficial relationship with facts and the truth.