backgroundcow

joined 2 years ago
[–] backgroundcow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Crush both apples with the blunt side of the knife. Divide applesauce equally.

[–] backgroundcow@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

"Absolutely, rest up" is more than sufficient in 99percent of cases

Internal monologue: "But wait, will it come off as impolite if my reply is this short? I better add something about how I'm sad to hear that they are sick. And maybe also something that I hope they will get better soon. Hmm... how do I say that without sounding like I expect them to be better soon-- that they can and should feel allowed to recover at their own pace? But, now it sounds as we don't need them at work-- I also want them to feel missed. Also, is there a risk they take 'rest up' wrong?, as if it is their fault they are sick because they haven't rested enough?-- I'd better soften up that formulation. Then, how do I start this email? 'Dear x,' seems too formal, maybe 'Hey,' -- no, that sounds like 'Hey listen up!'; maybe I'll just skip the greeting to make it feel more like a casual conversation. Do I still sign the email? With "Regards?", "Best regards?", "Sincerely?", "With wishes of swift recovery?" Should I also cut the email footer to make it seem less formal? What if they need to forward this to show that they have my permission? In that case the formal footer is probably useful.... etc. etc.

[–] backgroundcow@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

I very much understand wanting to have a say against our data being freely harvested for AI training. But this article's call for a general opt-out of interacting with AI seems a bit regressive. Many aspects of this and other discussions about the "AI revolution" remind me about the Mitchell and Web skit on the start of the bronze age: https://youtu.be/nyu4u3VZYaQ

[–] backgroundcow@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

John Oliver had a segment on this that may help convince people that it is real: https://youtu.be/3kEpZWGgJks

[–] backgroundcow@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What you describe is more or less the Nordic economic model, except the basic income. Corporate abuse is low, because it is not unthinkable to "not work" in response to such abuse, but also because unions are strong. Nevertheless, a lot of people still work a lot, so it doesn't completely change the work/life balance oddity op is posting about.

[–] backgroundcow@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Thanks for giving the link and making this an easy 1-click thing. Just donated.

[–] backgroundcow@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

On the topic of things to never forgive Redhat about, aren't there other things that are more pressing? Like, inventing a whole scheme to circumvent the idea of the GPL license via service contract blackmail?

[–] backgroundcow@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

I couldn't agree more. If there only was a somewhat user-friendly setting that allowed the oom killer to be far more aggressive, killing or freezing processes as soon as their memory use starts to affect system responsiveness, and just tell me this is what has happened.

[–] backgroundcow@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

ADA should be the lawful good.

Bash is chaotic neutral.

Java is lawful neutral.

Javascript fits ok as chaotic evil.

Move ASM to neutral evil.

And maybe f77 as lawful evil.

[–] backgroundcow@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago (4 children)

On this topic: I currently have installed on my phone and computer: slack, zoom, MSTeams, element, discord, Facebook messenger and signal to communicate in various projects and friends. What is this madness?!

[–] backgroundcow@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[–] backgroundcow@lemmy.world 229 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's On Me, I Set the Bar Too Low

 
 
view more: next ›