baduhai

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I read that, but my question still stands.

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Not sure I entirely understand this, would this function as a replacement for the *arr stack?

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm allergic to subscriptions, but I might just consider it.

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 week ago

What? The two things have nothing to do with each other. A GNU operating system doesn't need to be open source or have its source code available anywhere. A GNU operating system just means it uses GNU tools.

You could write a new kernel from scratch, never distribute a single character of the source code, make an operating system with your new kernel along with GNU tools, and even sell your operating system, which the GPL allows for. The GNU tools would still be open source, sure, but your operating system would be neither open source, nor have its source code completely available.

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 week ago

Which means it isn't truly open source, just that the source code is available.

Don't get me wrong, I love that the source for TF2 is available, but it's not open source.

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 week ago

I've heard the term source available be used, though not sure how popular it is.

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You can follow whatever you think is best. I'll stick to and evangilise what I view to be the correct definition of open source.

Ubuntu is not FSF approved, and guess what, it's still a GNU operating system

What makes Ubuntu a GNU operating system isn't the fact that it's FSF approved, it's the fact that it uses GNU tools.

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Huh, I would like to see that.

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

No, those would not be open source.

Definition of Open Source: https://opensource.org/osd

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago (5 children)

ContraPoints is fantastic, but I have a hard time watching the content if I'm not in the headspace for it.

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Just to be pedantic, if the source is available, but there are restrictions on how the source is used, it's not open source.

Open source licenses do not forbid anyone from using the source code for any purpose.

[–] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 week ago

Eh, I wouldn't turn myself down, but I'd certainly not go out of my way to hit on me. I'm not really my type.

 
8
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by baduhai@sopuli.xyz to c/musicpiracy@lemmy.fmhy.ml
 

I've had this idea for a while now, and always wondered if a program like this existed, but never found anything like it.

The idea is a selfhosted service/script/daemon that connects to music streaming platforms APIs and automatically downloads your play history. You'd keep listening to your music library on the streaming service until you think you've built a big enough of an offline library and then just drop the streaming service.

This would be a great way to build a music library for people who want to drop streaming services but don't have a music library. I might just put something together myself.

view more: ‹ prev next ›