Not sure I entirely understand this, would this function as a replacement for the *arr stack?
I'm allergic to subscriptions, but I might just consider it.
What? The two things have nothing to do with each other. A GNU operating system doesn't need to be open source or have its source code available anywhere. A GNU operating system just means it uses GNU tools.
You could write a new kernel from scratch, never distribute a single character of the source code, make an operating system with your new kernel along with GNU tools, and even sell your operating system, which the GPL allows for. The GNU tools would still be open source, sure, but your operating system would be neither open source, nor have its source code completely available.
Which means it isn't truly open source, just that the source code is available.
Don't get me wrong, I love that the source for TF2 is available, but it's not open source.
I've heard the term source available be used, though not sure how popular it is.
You can follow whatever you think is best. I'll stick to and evangilise what I view to be the correct definition of open source.
Ubuntu is not FSF approved, and guess what, it's still a GNU operating system
What makes Ubuntu a GNU operating system isn't the fact that it's FSF approved, it's the fact that it uses GNU tools.
Huh, I would like to see that.
ContraPoints is fantastic, but I have a hard time watching the content if I'm not in the headspace for it.
Just to be pedantic, if the source is available, but there are restrictions on how the source is used, it's not open source.
Open source licenses do not forbid anyone from using the source code for any purpose.
Eh, I wouldn't turn myself down, but I'd certainly not go out of my way to hit on me. I'm not really my type.
I read that, but my question still stands.