Man, what a shame about the purge before. But then again, many heads take its place (via many repo) so I guess it's a win.
bitfucker
Or you can use 100% with countdown and skip options
I personally think that if valve with their size managed to make a game and maintain their infrastructure for other publishers to use, wtf did the competitor do this whole time?
...range from significant scientific laws such as Newton's laws of motion, to humorous examples such as Murphy's law
Wait, I thought Murphy's law is actually a serious one.
Damn, I imagine how you would try to imagine a higher dimensional construct.
I do have a vivid imagination, but when I imagine doing something disgusting voluntarily I can anticipate it. Not so much when I imagine it from hearing or reading a story and in the middle of imagining things.
Genuinely curious, why did the south send the balloon in the first place? The article only mentioned that it was led by activists and North Korean defectors.
If that was an oversight from the south, that looks really bad IMHO. Look how we treat balloons sent by China that is immediately shot down. It could very well hide a weapon/surveillance instead of leaflet and hence the raising tension.
It's the dino disappointing some other dino because he thought they would never meet again in their lives. And yet they meet.
I thought my screen was problematic until I zoom in to the tail lol
So does x86. The difference is license. Just like how Intel and AMD have a VERY different design (implementation) as of now, so does RISC-V. Any vendor can implement it however they want, but they won't have to pay anyone for using RISC-V ISA
I'm being pedantic here but RISC-V is not a hardware architecture as in something that you can send to a manufacturer and get it made. It is an ISA. How you implement those ISA is up to you. Yes there are open implementations but I think it is important to distinguish it.
Yes.