bitfucker

joined 2 years ago
[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago

I can already imagine the log generated will be a hint. We usually automate those anyway as it is closer to (D)DoS too.

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago

Well, this is just my 2-cent. I think you misunderstand the point I am making. First of all, accept that translation is a lossy process. A translation will always lose meaning one way or another, and without making a full essay about an art piece, you will never get the full picture of the art when translated. Think of it this way, does Haiku in Japanese make sense in English? Maybe. But most likely not. So anyone that wanted to experience the full art must either read an essay about said art or learn the original language. But for story, a translation can at least give you the gist of the event that is happening. Story will inherently have event that have to be conveyed. So a loss of information from subtlety can be tolerated since the highlight is another piece (the string of event).

Secondly, how the model works. GPT is a very bad representation for translation model. Generative Pretrained Transformer, well generate something. I'd argue translation is not a generative task, rather distance calculation task. I think you should read more upon how the current machine learning model works. I suggest 3Blue1Brown channel on youtube as he have a good video on the topic and very recently Welch Labs also made a video comparing it to AlexNet, (arguably) the first breakthrough on computer vision task.

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, nevermind, I didn't know what I wrote either. I need my sleep lol.

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Depends on the application. When the user is able to set the schema via database, then you cannot assume the shape of the data.

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

GPL v2 don't, which lead to tivoization. But Linus himself didn't agree with that standing.

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I prefer CUID

Just to clarify: Yes, I do know not all use cases are appropriate for CUID. But in general when generating ID, I'd use CUID2

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And the other memes just mention moth vibrating their genitals to throw off bat.

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago

I cannot find the reference to the port being flimsy. I did however find the part where the top hotswap component (touchpad and the place where the plate is) is having problems. The only side port that they mention is the charging port. But the again, as I said, the firmware must be redone to account for said removeable dGPU. Now you may be wondering how big of an effect does it make when adding removeable dGPU. Off the top of my head, the motherboard must have the power supply circuitry remade to account for the additional power draw when needed. That alone will make the firmware for power control need to be redone. It can have wide range of effect for other components too because power firmware is really far reaching and may break assumption in other firmware. Not to mention a part of the cooling system is also removeable now. Framework has gone out of their way trying to invent a new standard for removeable dGPU on a laptop.

Btw, here is the quoted article that mentions the side port.

Twice, the touchpad suddenly stopped scrolling and stopped accepting button presses until I physically removed it from the system and reseated it. I’ve repeatedly gotten a Windows message about how my “USB device might have limited functionality when connected to this port” even if I’m just plugging in the charger.

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Oh really? I didn't know that once since I only referenced the article. The article had issues with the modular top side, not the port. So I guess we were talking differently from the beginning.

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Uhh, does the model 13 have a modular panel? IIRC, they don't. Also, manufacturing modular panel and modular port are very different and the knowledge transfer cannot be that big. The port for example has a looser tolerance since they aren't really that visible most of the time. So being snug but not flush is good enough. I can imagine the panel doesn't have that luxury. Stability issue, that I can agree. But then again, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt since they must handle additional assumptions that cannot be made on other laptops. Namely, modular GPU. Writing a firmware with that new assumption could be a PITA.

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 12 points 2 years ago (6 children)

You do realize the 13 doesn't have the back part for replaceable dedicated GPU right? That means the chassis itself must be redesigned since the hole will make the previous experience in the 13 different enough.

view more: ‹ prev next ›