Yeah, no. The commenter has stated actual child, not cartoon one. It is a different discussion entirely, and a good one too. Because artwork is a part of freedom of expression. An artwork CAN be made without hurting anyone or abusing anyone. We fully know that a human has creative capabilities to come up with something without having those actual something exist beforehand. It implies that humans can come up with CSAM without ever having seen a CSAM.
bitfucker
joined 2 years ago
What he probably means is that for a "photo", an actual act of photography must be performed. While "artwork" can be fully digital. Now, legal definition aside, the two acts are indeed different even if the resulting "image" is a bit-by-bit equivalent. A computer could just output something akin to a photograph but no actual act of photography has taken place. I said the legal definition aside because I know the legal definition only looks at the resulting image. Just trying to convey the commenter words better.
Edit to clarify a few things.
I wanna know if this applies to copyrighted content as well. For example, if by any chance a whole ass book was outputted by a LLM, does the output retain the original copyright?
It would be funny if that happens since the EU is having problems with Russia too. Will Russia help the EU (by proving that America is not as powerful as they'd like to think) or take advantage of the situation I wonder.
Seriously asking, what is The Pack community? I've seen their memes are basically like this and talking in CAPS.
Well, both ways are a valid shitpost. Congratulations! You made a palindrome shitpost!
Reading it right to left changes the meme
Usually STEM is used
I thought you were hallucinating, but apparently the mod has something with Brad I guess
Flashback to the chicken slap cooking calculation
Stuxnet would like to have a word
Man, I miss the ork communities