cerebralhawks

Feel like I saw this on a video game once. The kind of thing that works in a game but not in real life.

Everyone saying loot box toys should be illegal should ask themselves if Magic: The Gathering should be illegal too. Or baseball cards. "Blind box"/"blind packs" have existed for decades. It's only a problem now because they're toys instead of cards? Or were they always a problem? Please clarify.

I personally think Labubus are fucking ugly as hell. But we have blind bags in the anime fandom, pretty much any big franchise gets them. SPYxFAMILY, My Hero Academia, Chainsaw Man... probably Dandadan and Demon Slayer, though I haven't seen those yet. Anyway, you buy a bag and there's a figure inside. The one you probably want is rare. It's nice with SPYxFAMILY because Yor (the mother) is the rare one, not Anya (sort of the mascot of the show, the dumb-as-a-box-of-rocks four-year-old telepath with the pink hair and horns who is just so friggin' cute). If they made Anya rare, the fans might be in trouble, but it's just the ones horny for Yor that end up wading through a pile of Loid (the dad), Anya, and Becky (the friend) to get to the one hot chick they want. And that's what it seems to be, the hot chick the horny young guys are after is the rare one. If you like the cute character or one of the guys, you'll probably get your figure or you can trade for it, or buy it off someone who doesn't want it. Then again, if you're horny and not dumb, you can spend the money you're spending on blind bags on a figure that has more detail.

But again: baseball cards have existed for decades. Where was the outrage then? And baseball is just as dumb to a lot of Labubu fans as Labubu is to jocks. What's the diff?

As an iPhone guy who doesn't mind the limitations, it's really sad to see Android losing everything that made it different from Apple. Headphone jacks, memory card slots, and now sideloading, with an honourable mention to Nova Launcher.

If Android is going to be just like iOS, you better not still be paying iPhone prices for Android phones, being that the original intent of Android (as when Google bought it) was to harvest more user data (than Gmail could) to be sold. You're getting a weaker phone that collects your data and sells it to the highest bidder AND you're paying iPhone prices AND you can't sideload anymore (or, after such date in the future)? Nah, fuck that. At that point you should just get an iPhone, right? Seriously, take a good hard look at the iPhone 17 (the base model, not the Air or the Pro). $800 gets you privacy first, 256GB of storage, it's the second most powerful phone out there (the Air and Pro have more cores), two cameras (so not as good as Pixel 10 at the same price in that regard but better video recording). Samsung has some advantages but they sell your health data. Apple Health being private is now a feature that the others do not have.

Obviously we need a third option because if Google/Android won't compete with Apple, who will? And if nobody's competing with Apple, why should Apple improve? Hell, the 17 series is a joke... not that the 16 series was a huge improvement over the 15 series. I feel like my 16 Pro Max will go ten years, won't need to be replaced unless it gets physically broken.

Yes.

I think Mistborn would make an awesome HBO-type series, even though the series is mostly PG-13. There's fantasy violence but no sex. The series was inspired by Star Wars (specifically, the Force) and has a similar target audience, though it's medieval, not space.

I'd love to see The Dark Tower series get adapted as an anime, specifically by the studio that did Attack on Titan. The series would be unfilmable, even for HBO. Japan wouldn't flinch though. The only thing Japan really flinches at is sex, though they've let up quite a bit over the years. And LGBTQ+ stuff — and yes, I'm aware yaoi/yuri (same-sex sex stories) exist. I also know that they're taboo in Japan, big time. Even shounen-ai/shoujo-ai (same-sex romance stories) are heavily censored, like in Yuri on Ice when the two guys kiss, the camera pulls away. They couldn't actually show two cartoon dudes kiss, but you 100% knew they kissed. Genitals can't legally be shown at all (they use light most of the time, like a stray beam of light covers it up) due to Japanese censorship laws. But all kinds of violence? Fair game. And the act of sex can be shown from a distance and without certain detail, so the scene where someone bangs a demon to keep the others safe? Perfectly fine as long as it's not shown up-close and in intimate detail. Rest of it would be fine for Japan/anime and in line with what that studio has done (particularly with that series).

I don't know if they're CPU or GPU intensive, but I've heard Call of Duty Warframe pushes the phones to overheat. I dunno, never played it. Also, iPhone 15 or 16 and later can play a handful of AAA games. Nothing good, just some Capcom and Ubisoft slop. Assassins Creed and Resident Evil stuff. The new ones, too.

Pretty sure the last couple generations of iPhones are more powerful than the Switch 2. Pretty sure most phones from the last 5-6 years are more powerful than the Switch 1. The Switch 1 was just a reworked Nvidia Shield tablet... from 2014. It had more RAM than the phones of its time, and the Tegra GPU hit a little harder, but the whole Switch 1 was quickly outclassed by every flagship phone on the market after a couple years, and the Switch 1 came out in like 2016 or 2017. Basically if you have a good phone from 2019 or 2020 or later, it's more powerful than a Switch 1, and Switch 1 ran Breath of the Wild and Tears of the Kingdom (with cel-shaded graphics and heavily optmised).

A lot of us in tech are guilty of underestimating ARM64, but it's been doing great. Apple has used it exclusively in their desktop and laptop computers (the M-series Macs) since 2020. I have an M2 Pro on my desk, it can run Cyberpunk and you probably know how small it is. Whole computer is like 7.75" square and maybe an inch tall?

I'm not saying Washington/the US is better than China. But, the devil you know. Also, the devil we know (the west) has probably lied to us in a few ways about China. I remember as a kid I believed children in China were starving. I also remember hearing that they kill female babies (and often not humanely) because of their one child policy. My dream when I was a kid was to save all those girls and educate them and teach them basic fighting skills... may have been like a Charlies Angels kind of thing going on in my head.

I suppose I should have updated my information before saying that... last I checked, there weren't, but I don't know how old that information is.

I've never heard of Trekkies as a generational term. I've always understood that Trekkers were people who enjoyed the show as a show (they're on the Trek) whereas Trekkies enjoy the show as part of the show (they're in the Trek). Like they believe Trek is real, or it's our actual future, and that Klingons and Vulcans are out there somewhere. Gene Roddenberry preferred this term because the show is about hope, that things will get better to where the show is, and that when things are bad on the show, hope that they will be better or that it will all work out in the end. But me? I just like it as a show. It's not "real" to me.

Though, I suppose everyone's relationship with Star Trek (or, any other franchise) is unique and personal to them and you can't just divide the fans into two categories. Still, that is what I always understood the difference between the two types was, as we are a franchise that has two names for its fans.

Regarding what you said about them having a generic space show and naming it Star Trek. That has happened before. Deep Space Nine exists because the guy made Babylon 5 pitched it to Paramount and they ran him off and stole his idea. Yes, Deep Space Nine is awesome and we love it, but it would not exist if not for Babylon 5, which we should all be thankful we also got. To this day no one who wasn't involved knows exactly how much DS9 took from B5, but DS9 was not originally Star Trek, and it was widely criticised for not being Star Trek being that they were not exploring and that they were on a space station. I imagine a lot of episodes of TV started out as something else, some unconnected idea that was shoehorned into that show in the writers room. So while I don't doubt that Discovery may have not been an original Trek idea, I do not care because neither was DS9 and I love DS9.

I'm not disagreeing with you, though, and I agree with some of your clarifications, particularly in point 1.

Shazam couldn’t ID the track. It’s typical for a song made for an anime OP/ED to come out like a week steer the anime debuts, but at least they usually tell you what it is… anyone ID it from the kanji?

Yes and no. It's not about the price of the phone, it's about the capability of the modem and the material between the modem and the sky.

About ten years ago, I went to visit family in another state, and I blew my brother's mind with the speeds my iPhone was getting. He thought it was an iPhone thing. I said nah, much as I'd like to brag about having the more powerful, more private phone — I just had a newer modem. I think he had a Galaxy S3, which was a few years older than the 6s I had. I told him if he had the latest Samsung, he'd likely see comparable speeds.

Apple is getting into making their own modems, and the jury is still out on whether that's a good thing. I think the 17 series still use Qualcomm for 5G but they use Apple silicon for WiFi and Bluetooth. Maybe LTE as well, not sure about that. The Apple modem will almost certainly sip less power, but I'm not sure if it will be "better". Probably not.

I've been all over the smartphone debate and I've argued on both sides (for Android and for iPhones). I've never heard anyone seriously defend one having better network connectivity. iPhones are almost always universally faster. Right now the Galaxy S25 is faster than the iPhone 16 series, but the iPhones lose less power to thermal throttling, which is to say the iPhones are better for gaming since they lose less power, but if you're not a gamer, the Samsung will be faster. Camera is subjective. iPhone almost always has the best video recording, but their photos are oversharpened. Samsung oversoftens, and Pixels hallucinate details they can't see, with AI. (Zoom in on something far away with text, take a picture, then zoom in on the text and look at the AI-generated text that looks like it's from Animal Crossing. So what other details is it hallucinating?) But network connectivity? We don't get into that. Because it really boils down to "it's all the same but each generation improves upon the last a little."

I'm gonna go on record and defend the Deus Ex remaster. There's no way to play it on modern hardware. The only game console that can run it is the PS2, and not even then. The PS2 version was a whole other game because DX1 was too powerful for consoles. So it was basically DX1 dumbed down. Maps were smaller, everything was reduced... it was like a "de-make".

You can run it on Windows PCs with some tweaking, but if you don't have a computer with spyware, you can jump through bigger hoops. Linux has Proton. On my Macs I can do it with Whisky. It's really not hard, but I did need a third party tool called Deus Exe because the original DeusEx.exe was a complete no-go. I think it was made for Windows 98? Anyway, once I got Deus Exe up and running, I was even able to run Shifter, which was a mod for DX1 that tightened a few things up and added "legendary" versions of each weapon to various places around the world. I actually ran a mod of the mod, one I made myself that had more hacks to the game, like you could update your cyber link to rifle range, i.e. to use computers from across the room. Like V can do in Cyberpunk. Except DX1 wasn't made for that so it was kinda game breaking. But fun. I mean the game was never hard.

Anyway, they're bringing DX1 to Xbox, PlayStation, and Switch. And PC, of course. Hopefully Mac — the developer, Aspyr, has done Mac ports, but they were doing Mac ports of Xbox 360 games when Macs and Xbox 360s used the same PowerPC architecture, so that's kinda cheating. That said, anybody porting to Switch is a stone's throw away from porting to Mac since they're both ARM64, and that's part of why we even have Cyberpunk on the Mac now.

Stephen King is really bad with numbers. Apparently in the book they had to constantly walk at 4-5MPH, but they dropped it to 3 for the book. But sometimes King will just pull numbers straight out of his ass and his editor just lets it fly.

Similar case, in IT, he constantly described Ben as fat, as wider than he was tall, etc., basically fat shaming the kid, but his actual weight was just a bit over average. It's just in 1958 when the book took place, there really weren't fat kids, and the "fat kid" was the one who didn't look starved. Not like now where everyone's thick and fat really means fat. It's a matter of perspective, but the fact of the matter is, we might even consider Ben to be normal or underweight compared with the 11 year old boys (what he was) of today. King just liked to fat-shame. (But he also gave Ben a huge member in the train scene. Like shockingly big. So he didn't do the boy entirely dirty!)