it might work with obfuscation, in general my preferred solution is VPN+proxy, the proxy is used for bypassing the DPI and doesn't have to adhere to particularly high standards and can be easily swapped, and the VPN is used via the proxy for actually routing L3 traffic
chayleaf
joined 3 years ago
Well, Tor (with bridges) still works just fine, I don't really know any other "crowdsourced" proxy networks. Telegram isn't blocked (it used to be, but everyone used it anyway, including people in the government, so they unblocked it), so any info there is freely available. Wireguard and OpenVPN are blocked (even within Russia for some reason), shadowsocks is throttled on certain connections but works fine, and I haven't extensively tested anything else.
Also, mobile networks are used for testing stricter blocking measures before rolling them out to landline connections
not "any", but some very specific ones
snowflake is actually blocked quite well
searxng has bangs too
!bang to search using a specific engine, !!bang to redirect to a search engine's page
this kind of software is mostly used for tech support, so your option is too hard to setup
Firefox has a problem and Android phones are affected by it (does that help all of you down voters?l
I agree that's a problem, but refresh rate is one of the fingerprinting methods, and resistFingerprinting doesn't offer finetuning options (except canvas permissions?), which is what prevents me from using it
Firefox has a problem and Android phones are affected by it (does that help all of you down voters?l
you can change that in about:config, i think privacy.resistFingerprinting is the culprit
maybe they just want to make sure they'll be thrown in the camps no matter who comes to power
as a rhythm gamer, I can say you're full of shit lol
I have 240hz and the difference between 120hz and 240hz is somewhat noticeable, don't see why I'd need any more than this though
Target Israel and we will target you. [...] You have been warned.
What is this movie villain ass letter?
While I agree that LLMs can achieve human-tier efficiency at most tasks eventually (some architectural changes will be necessary, but the core approach seems sound), it's wrong to say it's modeled after the human brain. We have no idea how brains work as they're super complex, we're building artificial neural networks from the ground up. AI uses centuries' worth of math, but with our current maths knowledge the code isn't too complicated. Human brains aren't like that, they can't be summed up in a few lines of code because DNA is a huge mess that contains so much more than just "learning", so many inactive or redundant bits and pieces. We're building LLMs with knowledge of how languages work, not how brains work.