If you combine Econ 101 with American ideals of negative freedoms, libertatianism is what you get, and to be fair it sounds great on the surface. If you then turn a blind eye to all systemic issues that ruin that ideal of freedom/fairness you can even keep believing it!
conneru64
joined 2 years ago
Then you're regular blind
As they said, you can push for this change in the primaries. No shame in being principaled or taking a long shot there, but in the general you're just handing power to a fascist if you don't vote dem.
I don't get why you're going around every comment here to complain about being talked down to while you seem to not even understand what you're arguing against.
That would be amazing if they did, but I think you missed the part about human rights being on the line if you don't strategically vote for them. We're aware it sucks.
So you won't use your vote to help less people die?
But in the end, clown carton of eggs x in Z^+ | x = 0 mod 2 gas liquid solid
I have a programming joke, but it doesn't work
Emoticon
You said "and if not" which is binary, but "if [predicate] [x] and if [predicate] [y]" is not generally exhaustive.
Ohhh, you read the "and if" as being exhaustive. If they said "either... or" then I'd be with you, but they just listed 2 possible scenarios.
This is what hell looks like
"Heat from fire"