Not really sure where you got that from, given that the article and the article's source of the tracker they are using has pretty clear language indicating that these are 600,000 recorded deaths that can be directly attributed to the reduction in aid. Where are you getting this?
cuckmaster69
joined 2 years ago
i mean, albinoblacksheep, newgrounds, and ebaums world were things before and around the time of youtube; iirc the main thing youtube had was a clean design and a decent video player that handled buffering without stuttering. it made it easier for people to just upload a video and share it. ebaumsworld kind of had that i think, but the site layout was a mess and i'm pretty sure i remember them basically just stealing the content of other sites like albinoblacksheep
isn't there a difference between a president actively pursuing a firing of someone based on their free speech, vs a company deciding to do it for any reason other literal government coercion? if disney decides someone is fired because they think the court of public opinion is going to result in a negative financial impact, that's pretty different from the president of the country calling for his firing even if there's a percentage of the population who called for their firing.
pretty sick of the false equivalencies between the government applying influence, and private corporations deciding actions based on what they deem profitable. neither are based on morals, but the government is supposed to be the one curtailing this shit, not fanning the flames.
that said, i do think i agree with you partly, if i read this correctly, in that people should absolutely be ready to be punched in the face if they hold a contentious opinion. a lot of shitheads would be shutting the fuck up a lot more if nazis got punched more often instead of being praised. if being not-fascist becomes a contentious opinion, you can be sure as shit i'll be ready to be punched in the face for standing up against racist fuckhead nazis
for fuck's sake, someone list the 5 drugs if you're going to post a paywalled article. fuckin clickbait-ass shit
why not firefox + ublock on mac? safari's so obnoxious to use
Okay, I can see how you would interpret the source that way. It certainly does use statistical data to approximate deaths. It feels a bit disingenuous to state it as "its estimated that 600,000 people would have died by now". That makes it sound like it's just a number pulled from estimates of how much things cost, at least in my opinion.
One of the studies on Malaria was able to create "near-real-time projections" for 2025 malaria cases. A projection doesn't mean the same thing as an estimate. You can can estimate that 50 out of 100 coin tosses would be heads, and you'd probably be right, but if you projected it, you'd have to measure the dimensions of the specific coin, control for wind, etc, and while you still might be wrong, you'd likely be less wrong than merely estimating based on the two possible outcomes and a glancing observation that the coin is roughly symmetric/evenly distributed.