danc4498

Don’t question corporations forcing people to come into an office to work on a computer all day.

I’m willing to bet they would cache the garbage ai summary… not that that makes a difference to your overall point.

The ai garbage at the top doesn’t stop you from doing that.

On the one hand, it’s insulting to expect people to write entries for free only to have AI just summarize the text and have users never actually read those written words.

On the other hand, the future is people copying the url into chat gpt and asking for a summary.

The future is bleak either way.

Thanks! It’s been so long since I left Reddit that I forgot this one.

I’m gonna pretend to be an ice agent and go into a McDonald’s and order a McFlurry and pay for my it and say thank you and eat in the lobby and clean up my mess and leave and never mention I’m an ice agent.

Flag code aside, people who deify the American flag over the rights and welfare of human beings should spend a year in jail.

Flags are just things. Burn ‘em, wave ‘em, tattoo them on your buttcheek. I don’t care. It’s not more important than the human beings being treated like garbage.

I will remain doubtful until actual evidence comes out.

The example they gave was somebody noticing the name on the ballot didn’t match what they chose on the screen. I don’t know about others, but I always look at the ballot before putting it in the box. If I noticed Trump’s name, I absolutely would have said something.

If they are implying this happened on such a massive scale that Trump would have actually lost (120k in PA alone), then I guarantee this issue would have been noticed by a much higher percentage of people and would have been all over the news on Election Day.

Besides, I think exit polling generally matched up with the results.

Expand deliciously

Would we have beat the nazis if they just stayed in Germany?

Yeah, this makes sense. I wasn’t exactly thinking about the impacts of current events on the future, and that playing into how things are remembered, but that’s a good point.

I think part of what I was getting at is that history is often blurred by memories of the events and the limited media and reporting that stood the test of time. A narrative will form and there will be limited amounts of stats that contradict it.

This aspect will be different going forward. The memory is less relevant since we have an overwhelming amount of media and reporting that lives on. And we also have massive amounts of first hand video footage that.

Maybe history will just be defined by who creates the best narrative out of this massive amount of data. And people will still ignore the contradicting evidence. It happens in real time anyway.

Side bar: I don’t think the way “history” remembers current events matters anymore. The way news spreads and is remembered is so different now than it was in 1965 that I don’t think history will view our current time that much differently than we did. Just my theory.