Why would you re-post the same misinformation three times and then keep all three posts up after you've been corrected twice? The Star is not owned by Post Media.
danielquinn
Suggesting that multiculturalism has always been harmful to Québéc is a bit rich when you consider that it was adopted as a policy largely as a reflection of the multicultural nature of the French culture within a majority-English Canada.
Québéc has its own language, history, food, and culture, sure, but they also have their own legal system and a massive political party that advocates for their own political and cultural interests.
Well presumably there are at least some performance and safety benefits to using these new alternatives. Otherwise it's just a blatant license dodge.
Yes. Tailscale is surprisingly simple.
# systemctl start tailscale
# tailscale up
Debian should fork it and re-license it under the GPL.
In addition to the excellent examples posted here that refute this, I want to add "Last Exile", "Wonderful Days", and "Chrono Crusade".
If a cyclist is going to take the lane (and we have every right to) it's very dangerous to leave any room for drivers to pass because they inevitably try this sort of shit.
Ride out into the middle of the lane. Make them recognise you as someone taking the lane. They'll still want to kill you for daring to be a cyclist, but they won't want to damage their car.
Because your reading comprehension skills have grasped the last line: "but of course that's not where we're directing our efforts"? The vast vast majority of AI effort and funding is being poured into agents, the focus of the post.
Or maybe because you're curious?
Or bored?
You do you guy/girl.
As for parsing the waste stream, some sites do this in a limited capacity to filter out typical recyclables, but not for things like nickel, copper, gold, and other metals. I believe that tools like AI can and should be applied to going through decades of landfill to extract minerals that would otherwise have to be conventionally mined.
Sadly, it's not that simple.
They're not cramming AI into products to appease clueless investors. They're cramming into everything to see where it has traction because AI is very valuable... to them.
If a company can insert itself between you and your daily behaviour:
- buying groceries
- reading news
- browsing Lemmy
- writing reports/stories/software/music
...then it can control that experience:
- choose who you buy from
- choose what news you read, with the bias they want you to have
- control what sorts of stories/software/music you create
- set the price for that creation
This isn't idiocy, it's very profitable and fucking evil.
Dropping environmental concerns from a pension profile has got to be the worst sort of irony. What good is retiring with slightly more money if the world you're retiring into is literally on fire?
That was fantastically insightful.