If you're genuinely curious, you should probably watch the video. He makes a pretty good case.
danielquinn
joined 2 years ago
Yes, this is a list of US-owned papers. Note that the Toronto Star is not on it.
- The Toronto Star is not the Toronto Sun.
- The Star is owned by TorStar Media and is based in Toronto, Canada.
Delete this. It's misinformation. Leaving it up is a disservice.
That was fantastically insightful.
Why would you re-post the same misinformation three times and then keep all three posts up after you've been corrected twice? The Star is not owned by Post Media.
Suggesting that multiculturalism has always been harmful to Québéc is a bit rich when you consider that it was adopted as a policy largely as a reflection of the multicultural nature of the French culture within a majority-English Canada.
Québéc has its own language, history, food, and culture, sure, but they also have their own legal system and a massive political party that advocates for their own political and cultural interests.
Well presumably there are at least some performance and safety benefits to using these new alternatives. Otherwise it's just a blatant license dodge.
Yes. Tailscale is surprisingly simple.
# systemctl start tailscale
# tailscale up
Debian should fork it and re-license it under the GPL.
In addition to the excellent examples posted here that refute this, I want to add "Last Exile", "Wonderful Days", and "Chrono Crusade".
I'm working on a little program that'll launch different browsers based on the content of the URL passed and I'd like to set it as the default Web app in this list (under Settings → Default Apps). I've written a .desktop file based on the epiphany.desktop file, but it doesn't show up when I hit [Win]+o+p+e and it doesn't show up in the default apps either, so I'm hoping that someone here can explain what I've done wrong.
Here's the contents of the opening.desktop file:
$ cat ~/.local/share/applications/opening.desktop
[Desktop Entry]
Name=Opening
GenericName=Web Browser
Comment=Open links in the right browsers
Keywords=web;browser;internet;opening;
Exec=opening %u
StartupNotify=true
Terminal=false
Type=Application
Icon=/home/daniel/.local/share/applications/opening.png
Categories=Network;WebBrowser;
MimeType=text/html;application/xhtml+xml;x-scheme-handler/http;x-scheme-handler/https;multipart/related;application/x-mimearchive;message/rfc822;application/x-xpinstall;
Any criticisms are much appreciated!
Because you didn't. You're lying and I'm 100% sure of it.
For those interested, this is the bill, an absolutely monstrous document which when read on its own doesn't even convey the full extent of the changes because much of it is a series of paragraph amendments to other laws made out of context. To really understand what's being proposed, one must first understand the current state of all laws being amended, so it's really this giant document ×20 or so.
So unless it's your job to parse these documents, or you wrote it yourself, you did not read it.
I also did not read it, but at least I'm being honest about that. I did however skim through it looking for confirmations of what was mentioned in the video. What I found was enough to convince me that the video is accurate. What's more, the author has done the work of a responsible journalist: he cited his sources in the video description. Sources which were in turn written by responsible people whose literal jobs are to understand these massive changes and compile them into documents the public understand. You know, journalism.
Maybe you read the summary, which is much easier to parse, though still ridiculously long, lacking context and glazing over important details. Even in there though, there are clear mentions of allowing the opening of your mail, so if you read that and are still somehow cool with it then... well I guess it's true that we're all condemned to repeat history 'cause some people just refuse to learn.