dino

joined 2 years ago
[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 weeks ago

No because its not a rehash of old shit.

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago

Putting your money on old tech because your new tech is still to expensive. German industry 2025

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de -4 points 3 months ago

Also arguments or just scared of everything which is new?

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de -3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Can you quote the passage which mentions a monthly subscription? Maybe I overread it.

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Half Life 3 on Switch 2 lets go!

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 4 months ago

Bioware was dead 10 years prior...good morning.

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 months ago

But then your coordination will be lacking.

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Deadlock is nice, but the toxicity is the same as in every moba like teamgame, therefore I stopped playing it because I felt the time I spent playing were not enjoyable to me. Its sad because the game is so promising and delivers Valve typical polish which rivals triple AAA garbage.

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 months ago

just a new round buddy, you know you want it.

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 5 months ago

Ballatro or Path of Exile 2 I think.

55
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by dino@discuss.tchncs.de to c/gaming@beehaw.org
 

So yeah, I want to discuss or point out why I think Valve needs to fix Anti-Cheat issues. They have VAC but apparently its doing jackshit, be it Counter Strike 2 (any previous iterations) or something like Hunt: Showdown the prevalence of cheating players is non deniable. For me personally it has come to a point that I am not enjoying playing those games anymore, although they are great games by itself. But the amount of occurrences being killed or playing against cheaters is at a height, where I don't see the point anymore.

  • Why I think Valve is the only company able to something against cheaters?

Because they have the tools with VAC already aiming to prevent cheaters. Valve has got the resources to actually invest into something more profound which could be used for any game where anti-cheat protection needs to be implemented. And lastly Valve is the company which is interested in furthering the ability to gaming on Linux, the anti-cheat solution needs to work on both operating systems. Only Valve has the motivation and means to achieve that with their knowledge and resources. What do you guys think about the topic? Is the fight against cheaters hopeless? Do you think some other entity should provide anti-cheat protection, why? I skimmed over "anti cheat in linux kernel" posts in the net, but I have very little knowledge about the topic, what is your stance on it?

Edited: Mixed EAC with VAC. EAC seems to be part of Epic Company. Both of these tools seem unable to prevent cheating like mentioned above.

view more: next ›