dogs0n

joined 2 years ago
[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

It is active orally, I believe its a lot less effective in drink form though. People rub cocaine (powder) into their gums, that's common I think.

Coke ruined the taste when they removed the cocaine imo. It's horrible now, but still worth drinking on occasion (daily).

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I used to like cherry, but you just cant down 12 cans of cherry coke the way you can the OG.

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I have done no research, but my guess is it will be a waste of money right now. Any existing linux phones are too new for everything to be figured out. Pricing is likely very high for what you get right now too, since they don't have the scale yet (and probs other things).

I believe they are mostly an enthusiast type deal at the minute.

With some more time I believe they will become very appealing.

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Found out about no build mode when I was asked to play recently and the game is, to my surprise, fun without the building.

The people who have mastered building and can create a fort around me in 0.32 seconds are cringe in my book. Not sure how that was ever deemed a fun game mechanic, it's frustrating (to me, someone who only plays with their hands).

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

I would be hopeful that competitors bring the price down or even bring a much better experience with a higher price tag, which I think will only help cater to a larger audience (the budgeteers & the ballers).

Nothing will stop actual crap (e-waste level) from coming out, but I'm sure ppl match the experience to a brand name rather than a form factor.

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (5 children)
[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Dam i bothered looking it up after seeing your comment and 10 years of seeing it online makes sense to me now

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago

We wanna play on release!!!!!! We want them big booties in our face on day one!!!!! Not day 365!!!!!!

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Then flat flat spike spike for good measure

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The next ad you see: "The only device that lets you work-out, on your way-out, to work!"

A sad world indeed.

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sorry, I wasn't clear. When I said "why do you care?", I didn't mean YOU specifically with OPs potential problem of losing users.

I meant why do people in general, who self-host software for friends/family, care if their friends/family stop using the software.

E.g. I have friends on Plex, but for whatever reason, I decide I want to move to Jellyfin. My friends stop streaming my media because they dont like jellyfin for whatever their own reasons may be. I personally wouldn't care about losing them as "users", because it's not like they are paying customers. I let them access my instance for free, if they aren't bothered enough to use it, then thats on them, not me to cater to their needs by keeping Plex around.

Hope that cleared up my meaning. I wasn't attacking you for caring with your original response.

p.s. you are at risk by hosting Plex too, just in different ways. Plex still requires your server is open to the internet, right? Even if only Plex's servers can access it, who's to say Plex themselves don't get hacked. Always a risk/reward type deal with hosting software, in my opinion, either are fine to expose.

view more: next ›