donuts

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] donuts@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Is this on the wall in every Italian house? I unironically want one

[–] donuts@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] donuts@lemmy.world 16 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

So much this! I love a challenging game but sometimes you just want to experience the game without the frustration, and lowering the difficulty for yourself has zero impact on people who prefer the original or higher difficulty

[–] donuts@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I tag people that never fail to find something to argue about, obvious trolls, bad faith / sea lion conversationalists and so on. If I encounter them again and they show the same behaviour as a pattern, I fully block them.

I also use it for more fun stuff, like who is overly helpful, friendly or who recommended a good book. This way, if I see them again I get reminded of the positive interaction from before

edit: @OmegaLemmy@discuss.online you might want to replace "tag" with "label" or something, people think you mean username @tagging and don't read the body of your post

[–] donuts@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Searchcord yes, but not the researchers from the headline

[–] donuts@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It also includes deleted messages. And they refuse to delete things when someone opts out

Deleted messages are not included. Neither the public nor the API allows you to read deleted messages

Upon joining a server, users gain access to all non-deleted historical content within public channels, and the same is valid for data retrieval using their API.

[–] donuts@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

The original poster deleted their account, unfortunately. Took down this post too

[–] donuts@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago

Yeah, exactly. It may sound scary or like a violation of privacy, but there is no privacy when posting to public online areas.

[–] donuts@lemmy.world 91 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Well yeah, it's not encrypted. It would be the same as 10 years of Reddit posts or Lemmy posts scraped

[–] donuts@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The real guide is still either outdated or doesn't take into account that there's a lot more steps. But considering it's been 2 years, I don't hold that against the author

[–] donuts@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I think that's too simplified and it will create expectations that aren't true, because It's more like this:

  1. Choose instance

  1. Read & agree to Mastadon rules

  2. Read & agree to (instance) privacy terms

  3. Create account

  4. Tap the verification link in your email

  5. Solve the Captcha

  6. Get a list of people/users to follow (why these people? What is it based on?)

  7. Setup profile

  8. Done!

[–] donuts@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Ah sure, we just don't see the other bars I guess

78
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by donuts@lemmy.world to c/houseplants@mander.xyz
 

Edit: I realize this isn't technically a house plant as it is outdoors. Hope that's okay 😅

 

But I'm sure it's just because we humans are so annoying

 

In my language we call them Church Owls instead of Barn Owls because they nest in churches a lot.

 

Went to a demonstration slash workshop today where different owls and other birds of prey were introduced and talked about. Very interesting day!

 

After Profile effects and Avatar decorations, you can now buy Name Plates for your profile.

Honestly, this is the type of monetization that I dislike the least, considering the alternatives. You don't even have to have Nitro afaik, the premium subscription that allows mostly cosmetic perks

 

Discord has begun requiring some users in the United Kingdom and Australia to verify their age through a facial scan before being permitted to access sensitive content. The chat app’s new process has been described as an “experiment,” and comes in response to laws passed in those countries that place guardrails on youth access to online platforms. Discord has also been the target of concerns that it does not sufficiently protect minors from sexual content.

 

You might remember this post where I asked about how sorting by "Hot" gives you a lot of new posts that were posted in quick succession, making it look like "New".

I was recommend by a few to use "Scaled", so recently I did. Except this felt even worse: I saw new posts that were posted in succession with 0 upvotes, one having 1 upvote.

Isn't this weird? Or am I doing it wrong?

 

Not sure if this fits here, feel free to remove if not.

I'm sure the algorithm must be working as intended, but I always see a lot of rapid-fire posts under each other when browsing "Hot". Is this normal or am I missing a setting?

 

Part of the abstract:

Recent findings on the abilities of birds to see in the ultraviolet (UV) spectrum have expanded questions about plumage coloration to include the luminescent characteristics of bird plumage, including fluorescence. Yet little is understood about the function of fluorescent pigments, and very few studies have attempted to describe their distribution throughout a population. In this study, we used a fluorometer to measure variation in the amount of fluorescent pigments (e.g. porphyrins) extracted from the secondary coverts of Long-eared Owls (Asio otus) migrating through the Upper Peninsula of Michigan in the spring of 2020 (n = 99). We found that age and sex were the strongest predictors of fluorescent pigment concentration, wherein older and female birds had the highest fluorescent pigment concentrations.

I understand this is not your regular Superb Owl post, but I found it mighty interesting!

 

At least you can hide them, for now. Another notch on the "enshittification" scale.

view more: next ›