eluvinar

joined 3 years ago
[–] eluvinar@szmer.info 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There’s a good chance the limitless autobahn is actually part of what makes German numbers so good

There's a chance, but I don't think you argued why would it be a good chance.

It just requires stricter training and policing, stricter TÜV and for people to always check their mirrors before switching lanes.

Changing lanes and overtaking are always some of the most risky moments. It's always going to be much much safer if everybody drives the same speed vs. if you have to dodge because people are going 250 km/h for lulz. If you have the stricter training and policing, you still can improve safety by introducing speed limits.

[–] eluvinar@szmer.info 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's always assholes and they are always making it do bad things, so the distinction isn't even there. If you don't plan for assholes using the tool to try and do bad things, you're making bad technology

[–] eluvinar@szmer.info 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I mean it sure looks more better.

Is it actually decent for 2020s? IDK.

  1. the signalled pedestrian crossing looks like a waste of time for everybody If this is one way, as the old one was it's still very wide. Are you building for highway speeds? Same goes for curves.

  2. Was the right pedestrian crossing moved away from the desired path?

  3. Can we see more towards the bottom of the picture? It gets pretty wide for no obvious reason there. How are cyclists supposed to travel from the right side of the intersection to the left?

  4. If those are all one-ways, maybe it'd be a better use of space to give cyclists an separated counterflow lane?

  5. What's up with bike parking that's separated from the only bike lane with a lawn? That's like the worst possible place for it, far from every possible destination.

Again, it sure looks nicer, but you kind of have to realize it'll stay in that shape for 30, 40 maybe 60 years. So maybe build it really really well, this seems half-baked.

[–] eluvinar@szmer.info 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

well yeah, nobody is pretending like it's easy to fix on a personal level. Just that it's something we should be able to fix as a society because seriously, expecting people to commute 2 hours for a pear isn't very smart.

[–] eluvinar@szmer.info 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

people who live in 90% of the least densely populated land on earth are... not that many people in the grand scheme of things.

And if you live close enough to civilization to have utilities like power maybe it's possible to also have a grocery store that's closer than average distance between towns in germany. Might even be beneficial idk.

[–] eluvinar@szmer.info 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'd rather cycle when it rains than get a train, assuming it's not like 3 hours in a freezing temperature watching cars go by while I'm stuck at cyclists-only red light.

[–] eluvinar@szmer.info 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

collaborative and free to access and use

Except GPL which is literally "either join our socialist software revolution or fuck off and make your own software".

[–] eluvinar@szmer.info 2 points 3 months ago

Bardzo dobry pomysł!

[–] eluvinar@szmer.info 2 points 3 months ago

"ośrodek detencji" to coś jak "dziwny gest ręką" elona muska?

[–] eluvinar@szmer.info 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

and a lot of questionable consent sex situations if I remember correctly

[–] eluvinar@szmer.info 2 points 5 months ago

Fajne. Oczywiście to nie technologia jest fajna, tylko fakt, że nie spotkasz tam "normalnych" ludzi. Taka kontr/antykultura, gdzie ludzie piszą specjalnie po to, żeby trafić do niewielu osób. Trochę jak ziny. Ja nie mam nic do powiedzenia w dłuższych formach niż kilkuzdaniowe komentarze, więc mogę tam co najwyżej słuchać. Ale fajne.

[–] eluvinar@szmer.info 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

judging by project 2025 they can stop their own agenda by not being able to agree what it is.

view more: next ›