"gaymers"
intentional or not?
"gaymers"
intentional or not?
you're honestly one of the best. I wish I could have that kind of patience even just for my own family let alone others.
where Gaines placed in a sports competition is precisely relevant and needed to be pointed out. perhaps you're suggesting the way it was done could have been more polite?
but... why? when they are actively seeking out eradication why do you insist that being polite about facts is important?
nah. we know we are being robbed by the ruling class. but that doesn't change which outcome is the obvious better choice in a binary system.
throwing your vote away for the presidential election will never solve that problem and you're a pretty obvious dufus for thinking that it will.
down voted because I'm trying to understand but your punctuation makes it really difficult.
I will never understand why someone takes the time and effort to write a paragraph and then not bother to make sure that it's actually comprehensible. why bother?
note that pi hole doesn't block YouTube ads in smart TV apps. they push those through the actual video stream in order to get through ad blockers more effectively. I spent a weekend setting up a pi hole only to discover this sad fact.
defensive much? it's like you feel personally attacked because you do what mr triangle does and are now trying to justify it.
for the record I don't think the comic is implying that it comes from a place of love.
Thank you. I found the time limit really frustrating as I like to take my time with things and could never really get anywhere because I kept dying before I could make any progress.
if the template requires specific knowledge of the scene or movie context that is largely irrelevant to the joke then it's the wrong template.
I shouldn't have to read deep into the comments in order to get it.
except not via mobile devices. you have to pay for the app to work.
what about murder in war? is all the murder in Gaza wrong?
side question: why is the "DO" emphasized in the first post? when I try reading it like this it sounds so awkward and unnatural. shouldn't the emphasis be on "why"?