hayalci

joined 2 years ago
[–] hayalci@fstab.sh 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

6GB is more than enough for many desktop environments. Plus, a server wouldn't have any anyway. not booting the Ubuntu installer seems like a bug, or other non-resource problem. if you try with a newer installer, or some other distro, that computer can host many things.

[–] hayalci@fstab.sh 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fortnightly FTW. We can always (try to) re-educate the masses!

[–] hayalci@fstab.sh 1 points 1 year ago

it seems antennapod recently got the play state sync feature using gpoddersync.

[–] hayalci@fstab.sh 2 points 1 year ago

Lots of relevant comments in this post https://aussie.zone/post/4286731

[–] hayalci@fstab.sh 7 points 2 years ago

That's fine, it says "pie" anyway...

[–] hayalci@fstab.sh 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Case dismissed!

[–] hayalci@fstab.sh 1 points 2 years ago

ZFS has a "copies=N" setting, but documentation and discussion I can find say there's no guarantee that the copies will end up on different devices (vdevs in ZFS parlance)

[–] hayalci@fstab.sh 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] hayalci@fstab.sh 2 points 2 years ago

You can use Snikket with other servers too, there is no restriction or special sauce. It's mostly a fork of Conversations.

[–] hayalci@fstab.sh 2 points 2 years ago

The same author talks about load balancing in one article and retries in the other one ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

[–] hayalci@fstab.sh 4 points 2 years ago

in addition to "dedicated Nas + compute node" and "just use a desktop" suggestions, there's the microserver option in between. Small, but has enough power to run stuff other than storage.

Hp proliant microserver is what I use, you can try getting a previous generation from second hand market.

https://www.hpe.com/us/en/product-catalog/compute/proliant-servers/pip.proliant-microserver.1014673551.html

[–] hayalci@fstab.sh 1 points 2 years ago

"underpowered" routers are usually underpowered for multiple high bandwidth wireless connections. if you disable the wireless, shoving bits over copper would -usually- be efficient enough to not be the bottleneck.

view more: ‹ prev next ›