howrar

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

I can understand enjoying the state of being well rested or relaxing, but I can't relate to enjoying sleep. If I can have all the benefits of sleep without needing to sleep, I would take it with no hesitation.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

They've been in the AI game for about as long as everyone else. I would consider their lab to be one of the best in CV tech.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

If every friend group has all 9, then logically, I must be all of them.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

Not even if it's a career she genuinely enjoys?

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

Not even if it's a career she genuinely enjoys?

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Does 10 things, but those 10 don't include the one thing you asked yourself to do.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

YouTube has been most reliable for me. If you see someone showing their process/results and multiple people do it the same way, that's a pretty good indication that it's worth trying out.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If that's your idea of reversing the order, then you're not talking about the same thing as SpaceCadet@feddit.nl. They're talking about the order of operations and the associativity/commutativity property. You're talking about the order of the symbols.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not sure where the goal post was to begin with. I just thought it would be important to be aware of how we're all contributing to the project so that we can make an informed decision. I haven't thought this through enough to have an opinion on whether we should boycott either Framework or Lemmy.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

Sometimes, that means relying on [...] laws

We're you not just arguing against having laws to disallow stabbing? If not, then I'm not clear on what you mean by "controlling others".

"Radical acceptance"

Couldn't this also apply to abuse of power? Accepting that there's the possibility of bad outcomes, and that's the cost of certain benefits, like protecting everyone from some easily preventable causes of death. It sounds like maybe what you're arguing for isn't that exerting control over others in and way is universally bad, but rather that bodily autonomy needs to be protected above all. But if that's the case, I don't understand why you think it's only acceptable to protect it by not actively doing something that violates bodily autonomy, and why it's not okay to actively protect bodily autonomy (e.g. preventing others from inserting undesirable sharp objects into your body, whether that be a knife or an injection or anything else).

The Republicans centralized power in the presidency with the USA Patriot act [...]

I agree that centralization is power is problematic, but this is a whole other problem independent of bodily autonomy. Unless you're saying that controlling others is only bad when it's done by a central power? But you're also making arguments against mandatory vaccination in general, so I'm still unclear on what your stance is.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

You're not directly paying them, but by being here and contributing to the community, you're providing value to others who would then go on to donate to the devs.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

And you have to pay for Luol Deng.

view more: ‹ prev next ›