isolatedscotch

joined 2 years ago

now for only 140% the price!

In any major catastrophe they are abandoned and likely the meltdown and other issues could render whole areas uninhabitable. Might be manageable in certain power loss scenarios… but anything major and sudden like if you’re country suffered a nuclear attack or a major natural catastrophe and you survived I’d stay away from nuclear plants or chemical processing facilities.

this isn't chernobyl anymore, we have safe nuclear plants that have excellent emergecy shutdowns (the control rods are held up by electromagnets, and in a power loss they would instantly fall down, stopping the reactor)

with chemical companies, the idea is the same, but since they're handled by private corporations i wouldnt trust them that much with safety shut-offs in case of power loss. at most they'll have a backup battery and a diesel generator, which in a solar flare EMP will get destroyed too

[–] isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Let me tell you something: if a man could fuck a woman in a cardboard box, he wouldn't buy a house

-Dave Chappelle

[–] isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

None said anything about actually reducing ticket price by that, high prices stays forever.

Standard ticket if you generate at least 1KW, otherwise the price goes up if you generate less, with a fine for less then 50W generated during the flight

dont give them ideas!

they also used white phosphorus but it seems like everyone uses it these days

[–] isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de 98 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

the task i need to do on the computer:

view more: ‹ prev next ›