I never had my own AOL email account but I did throw away AOL signup disks and I sent email to AOL accounts... so I guess 20/20 assuming "phone bo" is a phone book.
As for not being long for this world... there are a lot of ways to go that don't link with being old, so I guess that checks out anyway.
The value in LLMs is in the training and the data quality... so it is easy to publish the code and charge for access to the data (DaaS).
So you would click accept on my self-signed https website? Want some land in Florida?
Stable (Debian) means that when you get it working it is less likely to break when you update. A broken installation on a server is quite stressful. Downside for desktop/laptop is that it may not support the latest games and hardware.
Ubuntu is probably more stable than Mint, but less stable than Debian. Which you choose may be more personal preference than objective value.
Yes, but if you are happy with Ubuntu don't worry about it.
Good morning, America!
Mint loaded Steam via the package manager and it worked out of the box for me. There have been some games I had to try different versions of Proton with, but I have never found that to be not true for some games.
Suggesting that her risk is going to drop by dropping soothing words for the lefty radicals falls to acknowledge the danger from righty radicals. Having the Cheeto pasting a target on her back means that such words will merely inflame the right even more.
Web search engine of your choice.
Keep in mind that every open source project scratches a different itch... they don't exist because people wanted to collaborate for collaborations sake... they exist because someone (or some people) wanted a particular software capability. This means that many of them started because one person had that itch, but there are millions of itches so the projects that need your help very likely won't fit into a convenient "top 100" list. Think about what you are interested in and search for open source software related to that topic.
The best approach is to not run untrusted software. Second best is to be a security expert and run it under the control of a debugger and analyze each instruction before it runs.
This is probably not what you wanted to hear, but every sandbox has flaws and software that is written by someone aware of those flaws can conceivably exploit them.
Tools like firejail are often useful early to mid software life cycle... before exploits become common for them. But there eventually comes a point where a zero day exploit is released and your peace of mind leads you to think you are safe. Their utility varies over time, and it is the nature of zero day exploits that they surprise you.
I think flatpak is a configuration management tool... not a security sandbox... but really the question comes back to what is your use case... do you want to become a security consultant, or are you just looking for a bit more protection from common exploits? There is no magic bullet... even dealing with the minutiae of locking down specific system calls will not protect you perfectly yet it can significantly increase the hassle of onboarding new software. Simply relying on signed software packages most of the can reduce the chance of encountering malicious software significantly over using unsigned packages if you are an ordinary computer user... and getting wrapped up in security issues when you are not aiming to be an expert can just add overhead to your life without making you significantly safer. Beware of the rabbit hole... it can feed your hypochondria rather than protect you if you let the wolf in through the front door and hope the locks scattered around will stop it from harming you.
They told the same thing to the rocks on Venus.
Darwinism?