jinarched

I think with time the rope will be inevitably cut no matter what at this point. I guess we'll see.

The industry makes something around 190 billion per year, they will be fine without raising their prices to 80$. I ran that in my head considering that I worked in the industry myself. Devs aren't paid enough not because we don't pay games enough but because these companies are run by greedy fucks. Don't feel bad for them, buy games when they are on sale or buy indie games. Games won't go anywhere be reassured.

Nah. I keep seeing this argument and I really disagree with it. It's actually really simple economics; we don't need to calculate inflation into this. If I think the price of something is too high (especially something I don't need to survive), I don't buy it. Companies can cry all they want, in the end I don't care.

Hunger Games

Installing softwares is much safer and easier.

Windows:

• Search app on a search engine
• Maje sure it's the legit app and not a trojan
• Download the app
• Find and run the .exe
• Going through the warning if not a Microsoft app
• Going through the wizard

Linux:

Either do something like...

"sudo dnf install (name of app)" in the terminal

Or simply click on "Install" in the software manager.

The trajectory of the shit moving toward the fan has reached its end.

Oh? Is that a new convention? It has been a while since I posted in here. (Fixed btw)

Good old gunmancy

If you are interested, Yanis Varoufakis has a very similar analysis of the current situation.

Young Matt Damon fades into old Matt Damon.

I agree.To me art is an expression of the soul; it's an expression of one's perception of the world. It has spiritual qualities (in an atheist sense). There is an inner world that puts out together a piece of art that LLMs do not possess and that's why they need to train on existing material that comes from human expression.

I highly doubt an LLM suffers, loves, hopes, hates and cries like us. Art is an expression of who we are individualy and collectively. LLMs only hallucinate with art made by humans. While we humans can find inspiration from other artists, it is not a necessity to train on vast databases of art pieces to put something together. They say that while it's hard to define what art is, you know it when you see it. To me when I get that feeling from something made by AI, all I really see is a piece of an other artist's soul trapped in some sort of simulacrum put together by an algorithm.

Cut the training material and AI "art" will stagnate. We, on the other hand, won't.

That's why I think AI art will never really be art... unless if one day they somehow develop a "soul" themselves and start to express an inner world of their own.