khepri

joined 2 years ago
[–] khepri@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Yes, if there's something every good scientist knows, its to present the best current understanding of something, and then the exact opposite of that, framed as being equally valid. For sure this is the way forward and good on you Zuck!

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Oh yeah, lol, thanks!

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (4 children)

The closer you are to no money, the more expensive life gets

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Its a stock that's heavily played by traders, it moves just as much if not more based on the technicals than the fundamentals. Also, look up the wonderful financial term "dead dog bounce".

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Or trying to look like they are trying. "Trying" kind of implies at least a tiny sliver of a chance of actually succeeding, which this, at the current political moment, absolutely does not have. Believe me, I'm all for them trying stuff, but this might as well be proposing eliminating the electoral collage, electing Senators based on population, or passing the ERA. I'm all for all of those things, but they are a total pipedream from our current position. I just really really don't think there is an appreciable number of voters out there who think that now is the time for democrats to be showing off their impossible Christmas wish list because "people will complain if we don't". What people are complaining about is Dems puttering around having meetings and proposing non-starter solutions rather than owning the fact that they got stomped this time and should now switch to organizing the type of ground-level resistance that worked such wonders for the republicans the last 10 years.

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

True. I really wish they would focus on things they can actually do as the minority. Like, this is performative, but I'm not even sure for who it's supposed to be performative. Do dems honestly think there's even a single voter out there with the attitude of "well I wasn't going to vote next year, but after seeing dems moonshot yet another dead-on-arrival amendment about a 15-year old court ruling I'm on board!"

Look at what republicans were able to accomplish on the level of school boards, counties, churches, state houses, election commissions, etc while they were out of power and steal their playbook for goodness sake 😒

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Demonizing immigrants and racial minorities, and endlessly repeating lies designed to bypass people's critical thinking thinking by triggering disgust reactions, in the quest to destabilize and dominate political matters through fomenting fear and hatred of "the other", is pretty much as classic nazi shit as you can get, tbf...

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

Yeah, I wish the legal system didn’t have this deference to “the voters will decide” when it reaches the level of actual criminal activity. Like the fact that you are running for or currently hold some office should have no impact at all on whether we are all equal before the law or how the law treats us. Yet every court and law enforcement agency seems terrified of the appearance of influencing the outcome of an election to the point that as long as you are running for something you are essentially legally bulletproof if the election is coming up soon.

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 101 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I wonder if they understand what they’re encouraging by making the punishment for protests harsher than the punishments for direct action…not that that’s any of my business…

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Where I live we get lots of local candidates who are some combination of democrat-green-progressive-working family alliances. Building coalitions from the bottom up like that, and showing that people with “green” in their bio can really be elected, is the way to move things forward. At the national level, the two-party system is far too entrenched to have a third party be anything but a defacto spoiler that turns off their own supporters more that anything else.

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago (2 children)

So they slapped some reinforcement learning on top of their LLM and are claiming that gives it “reasoning capabilities”? Or am I missing something?

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

It’s pretty hard to imagine a way for groups of people with varying goals and interests to operate without some form of value exchange. This can either be barter, or some form of currency. Our specific kind of extractive capitalism based on creating endless cycles of debt and credit can certainly be replaced with any number of alternatives, but the idea of money itself is just too basic and useful to humans, imo.

view more: next ›