lily33
while allowing legitimate users and verified crawlers to browse normally.
What is a "verified crawler" though? What I worry about is, is it only big companies like Google that are allowed to have them now?
I agree that it's difficult to enforce such a requirement on individuals. That said, I don't agree that nobody cares for the content they post. If they have "something cool they made with AI generation" - then it's not a big deal to have to mark it as AI-generated.
Is that something new? As in, has WaPo not been willing to go after Meta in a similar manner before?
So, essentially, they wanted to enter the Chinese market so much that they were even willing to comply with the local rules and regulations!
This is such a big secret, we really needed a whistleblower to tell us that!
Файнали, уи дон'т хев ту уори абаут спелинг энимор, иц ол ритан хау иц рэд.
An intelligence service monitors social media. They may as well have said, "The sky is blue."
More interesting is,
Sharing as a force multiplier
-- OpenAI
Do you know of a provider is actually private? The few privacy policies I checked all had something like "We might keep some of your data for some time for anti-abuse or other reasons"...
Too bad that's based on macros. A full preprocessor could require that all keywords and names in each scope form a prefix code, and then allow us to freely concatenate them.
Aren't USAid grants public?
Yes, OpenAI wishes everyone else has to have authorization to do model training...
Fortunately, their ToS don't matter all that much, it's easy to use their model through a third party without ever touching them.
That makes me think, perhaps, you might be able to set it to
exec("stuff") or True...