lily33

joined 2 years ago
[–] lily33@lemm.ee 23 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

In TikTok or instagram reels, you don’t follow people you like. You just watch stuff happening.

That's actually the whole point of TikTok, what made it different when it started. An app for short videos where you follow people you like is more of a Snapchat competitor, not TikTok.

[–] lily33@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

As someone who has no knowledge of the ecosystem: Why would people who self-host wordpress care about access to wordpress.org? Isn't the point of self-hostung to use your own infrastructure?

[–] lily33@lemm.ee 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (6 children)

I'm sure removing these maintainers would be of great help to the Ukrainian war effort...

More seriously: We need to help Ukraine more. But this doesn't do that. It just hurts a bunch of people (both the maintainers, and the people using their code) for no benefit whatsoever.

[–] lily33@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

What if you arrive early, didn't do online check-in, and have to wait for the check-in desk to open? It maybe I don't understand what you mean by "drop-off area".

[–] lily33@lemm.ee 28 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

If we wait for AI to be advanced enough to solve the problem and don't do anything in the meantime, when the time finally comes, the AI will (then, rightfully) determine that there's only one way to solve it...

[–] lily33@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago

My bet is, it'll be Saturday that goes, finally achieving a 6-day work week.

[–] lily33@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Actually, much of that description, perpetuated by dystopian novels, is pretty far off the mark - and it's the kind of mischaracterization that makes it harder to fight back against authoritarian governments.

The fact is, the vast majority of people in authoritarian states live ordinary lives, just like everywhere else. That's part of what makes these governments so resilient. If everyone in there lived a nightmare, they wouldn't last for decades, they'd collapse at the first sign of instability. After all, there are a lot more people than government officials.

For example, a canny authoritarian government won't disappear anyone who steps out of line. Instead, they'd provide a "safe, legitimate" way to step out of line, that's well regulated and doesn't pose a threat to the government, but serves as an outlet. And most people will be satisfied with it. That's both more subtle, and more effective, that instilling fear in everyone's heart.

[–] lily33@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

To add about the distro framgentation, and particularly:

If I run into a software I need and it specifically indicates it’s for another flavor of Linux than the one I run, how likely is it that I can get it to work on another distro without any real trouble?

You might have. Some software is distributed as a portable binary and can run on any distro. However, many installers are distro-specific (or distro family-specific, since they're made for a specific package manager). For example, a software packaged for Ubuntu as a .deb file would install fine on Ubuntu or Mint, and probably install fine on Debian, but if you want to install it on Fedora or Arch you'll have to manually re-package it.

Most distro-specific software usually ships debian or ubuntu package - so you might go with that for that reason. Or Arch/Endeavor: while you'll rarely see an official Arch package, most often someone will have already re-packaged it and put it on the AUR.

That said, for the major distros, the desktop environment makes much more difference than the distro.

[–] lily33@lemm.ee 19 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I'm not sure where the Linux kernel part comes from, but if I open the article and search for "linux" or "kernel", there are no matches...

[–] lily33@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago

Technically, "enforced pay it forward" is called credit. Your debt would then be "the amount you still have to pay forward".

Of course, this defeats both the spirit and the purpose of a pay it forward scheme.

[–] lily33@lemm.ee 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I don't know - but I'm willing to get those instances where people were saved weren't calls from anonymous voip numbers.

[–] lily33@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago
view more: ‹ prev next ›