overview for maxfandheart

Weird message generation glitches in c/perchance@lemmy.world

[–] maxfandheart@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

UPD2: started happening again, though this time it isn't preceded by two opening brackets. Also many messages appear with broken formatting, regenerations sometimes seem to stack on each other instead of replacing, and wrong perspective reappeared.

Weird message generation glitches in c/perchance@lemmy.world

[–] maxfandheart@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

UPD: hasn't happened since. Either fixed by now or an extremely rare glitch (happened to me only once).

3

Weird message generation glitches (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by maxfandheart@lemmy.world to c/perchance@lemmy.world

3 comments fedilink

Hello! I suppose the text model was recently changed, given how differently it writes. It seems fine, but it does have some growing pains, I guess.

For some reason, sometimes instead of a message, it only generates two opening square brackets: [[

That also seems to break something in message generation, as when you regenerate, it writes from a wrong character's perspective, in my case a character started writing from my perspective.

This is temporarily remedied by deleting the previous message and re-sending it again, which seemingly also deletes corrupted data.

Still, I think it's a pretty nasty bug which needs to be fixed.

Which side are You on? in c/perchance@lemmy.world

[–] maxfandheart@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I do appreciate your response. What I guess bugs me even more than this new model, though, is lack of communication from (at)perchance. No announcement for the new model, no warning. This post-factum clarification is fine, I think, but it doesn't feel enough. I'm not saying that they must pander to any whim, but with such backlash (here, reddit, etc.), some more direct kind of response is expected.

Which side are You on? in c/perchance@lemmy.world

[–] maxfandheart@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

And same question for the text generating model, as I know (at)perchance mentioned wanting to upgrade it next... Damn, updates should cause excitement, not anxiety! What's wrong with me?

Which side are You on? in c/perchance@lemmy.world

[–] maxfandheart@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

For me, the new image model just doesn't work at all, even wait times are horrible. And the result is unfortunately not worth that wait to me.

Does anyone know what was used as the old model? I would love to be able to continue using that in any way.