medgremlin

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But when they're really young you can do things like convince them that trees walk and that's why trees in cities are in those little cages or pens. (They do actually use their roots to pull themselves around a bit, but it takes a very long time for the amount of movement to be noticeable.)

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The age group of children that gets put on leashes doesn't have the brain development to feel shame or humiliation. Their brains have literally not developed the cortex that does that yet.

From the age of about 2 to 4, my Dad made a harness out of climbing webbing for me and clipped the leash to a carabineer on his belt when we were out and about. We were constantly going to places like Haight St in San Francisco and hiking on the sea cliffs in Santa Cruz. I 100% would have gotten myself killed without that leash because I was very curious about the fishies in the ocean at the bottom of that 50-100ft high cliff, and my Dad was wrangling me and my sibling by himself while Mom was at work.

I'm pretty sure there's a picture somewhere of me leaning over a cliff being held back by the leash because I was a rambunctious little gremlin that was about 20 years off from having a fully developed frontal lobe. And I want to find that picture and share it with my friends because I think it's hilarious.

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 4 points 1 day ago

That's why the trailer has me so hyped for this game. It looks like the game is going to be different because Ciri is the protagonist. Her experience, reactions, and approach to saving a young woman from being sacrificed are totally different than what Geralt's would be. I hate it when games like Mass Effect are like "Oh! You can play as FemShep! That totally counts as representation!" even though it changes literally nothing about the story.

I want more games that actually address the real and significant differences in the experiences and perspectives of different characters. I'm always disappointed when there's a "female" option that's just a re-skin of the male character with no changes in how the character interacts with the world and the story. (This happens a lot in non-video game media too.)

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're right. My brain is absolute pudding because I'm studying for my board exams. Doing a few hundred multiple choice questions about complex medical topics in a row doesn't leave a whole lot of processing power left for anything else.

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Unfortunately, it appears that you are correct. They released a list of qualifying conditions and while COPD and brochiectasis are on the list, asthma is not.

Edit: I'm kinda braindead right now. Asthma is the first thing on the list. whoops.

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 3 points 2 days ago (5 children)

That will usually qualify, especially since Covid is primarily a respiratory illness.

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 1 points 2 days ago

Part of my significant suspicion regarding AI is that most of my medical experience and my intended specialty upon graduation is Emergency Medicine. The only thing AI might be useful for there is to function as a scribe. The AI is not going to tell me that the patient who denies any alcohol consumption smells like a liquor store, or that the patient that is completely unconscious has asterixis and flapping tremors. AI cannot tell me anything useful for my most critical patients, and for the less critical ones, I am perfectly capable of pulling up UpToDate or Dynamed and finding the thing I'm looking for myself. Maybe it can be useful for making suggestions for next steps, but for the initial evaluation? Nah. I don't trust a glorified text predictor to catch the things that will kill my patients in the next 5 minutes.

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 4 points 2 days ago

It's entirely possible that it just wasn't diagnosed until very recently. Prostate cancer screening is not a standard recommendation at his age, and there are a lot of cancers that are very insidious. A lot of times, if there wasn't a screening test done for it, cancer is caught because of the symptoms of metastasis meaning that unless we're screening for cancer, we don't catch it until it's already progressed.

Some people are more attuned to their bodies and might notice the smaller, earlier symptoms, but for prostate cancer, they can be pretty easy to miss and the primary metastasis symptom is usually back pain from the cancer spreading into the lumbar vertebrae. A lot of people will just write that off as regular back pain and not go to the doctor for it.

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

My mistake, I recalled incorrectly. It got 83% wrong. https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/01/dont-use-chatgpt-to-diagnose-your-kids-illness-study-finds-83-error-rate/

The chat interface is stupid in so many ways and I would hate using text to talk to a patient myself. There are so many non-verbal aspects of communication that are hard to teach to humans that would be impossible to teach to an AI. If you are familiar with people and know how to work with them, you can pick up on things like intonation and body language that can indicate that they didn't actually understand the question and you need to rephrase it to get the information you need, or that there's something the patient is uncomfortable about saying/asking. Or indications that they might be lying about things like sexual activity or substance use. And that's not even getting into the part where AI's can't do a physical exam which may reveal things that the interview did not. This also ignores patients that can't tell you what's wrong because they are babies or they have an altered mental status or are unconscious. There are so many situations where an LLM is just completely fucking useless in the diagnostic process, and even more when you start talking about treatments that aren't pills.

Also, the exams are only one part of your evaluation to get through medical training. As a medical student and as a resident, your performance and interactions are constantly evaluated and examined to ensure that you are actually competent as a physician before you're allowed to see patients without a supervising attending physician. For example, there was a student at my school that had almost perfect grades and passed the first board exam easily, but once he was in the room with real patients and interacting with the other medical staff, it became blatantly apparent that he had no business being in the medical field at all. He said and did things that were wildly inappropriate and was summarily expelled. If becoming a doctor was just a matter of passing the boards, he would have gotten through and likely would have been an actual danger to patients. Medicine is as much an art as it is a science, and the only way to test the art portion of it is through supervised practice until they are able to operate independently.

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 1 points 3 days ago

Medical malpractice is very rarely due to gaps in knowledge and is much more likely due to accidents, miscommunication, or negligence. The board exams are not taken at the school and have very stringent anti-cheating measures. The exams are done at testing centers where they have the palm vein scanners, identity verification, and constant video surveillance throughout the test. If there is any irregularity during your exam, it will get flagged and if you are found to have cheated, you are banned from ever taking the exam again. (which also prevents you from becoming a physician)

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 3 points 3 days ago (4 children)

The AI passed the multiple choice board exam, but the specialty board exam that you are required to pass to practice independently includes oral boards, and when given the prep materials for the pediatric boards, the AI got 80% wrong, and 60% of its diagnoses weren't even in the correct organ system.

The AI doing pattern recognition works on things like reading mammograms to detect breast cancer, but AI doesn't know how to interview a patient to find out the history in the first place. AI (or, more accurately, LLMs) doesn't know how to do the critical thinking it takes to know what questions to ask in the first place to determine which labs and imaging studies to order that it would be able to make sense of. Unless you want the world where every patient gets the literal million dollar workup for every complaint, entrusting diagnosis to these idiot machines is worse than useless.

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

From the emergency medicine perspective on that last bit....we don't care if you have a DNR somewhere on file. If you show up in cardiac arrest and someone isn't shoving an official POLST into our hands, we're running the code. We'd rather someone try (and fail) to sue for malpractice for saving them than accidentally let someone die that didn't want to.

 

I'm a 3rd year medical student and I've already been caught off-guard a few times by the WILD medical misinformation my patients talk about, and figured that I should probably get ahead of it so that I can have some kind of response prepared. (Or know what the hell they've OD'd on or taken that is interfering with their actual medications)

I'm setting up a dummy tablet with a new account that isn't tied to me in any reasonable way to collect medical misinformation from. I'm looking at adding tik tok, instagram, twitter, reddit, and facebook accounts to train the algorithms to show medical misinformation. Are there any other social media apps or websites I should add to scrape for medical misinformation?

Also, any pointers on which accounts to look for on those apps to get started? I have an instagram account for my artwork and one for sharing accurate medical information, but I've trained my personal algorithm to not show me all the complete bullshit for the sake of my blood pressure. (And I have never used tik tok before, so I have no goddamn clue how that app works)

 

I wrote an essay (with sources! and data!) about what cutting Medicaid actually means because people don't have good perspective on it.

 
 

I'm working on creating a little social media presence for medical communication and education, and that includes a little substack where I've been posting some essays on my experiences in medicine. I would really appreciate any feedback folks have to offer or suggestions for topics that might be interesting to read about.

(I'm holding off on posting some of my spicier opinion pieces until I've graduated from medical school and gotten into residency, but I do try to be candid in my writing.)

 

I really have no idea what we can do as medical professionals to protect our pregnant patients. I try not to be pessimistic, but if H5N1 becomes another pandemic, I'm not very confident that Trump or those of his ilk in other countries are going to do anything useful about it.

This is a very small case series, but there aren't that many cases to study (yet). I still find it to be very concerning, even if it is a very small sample size.

 

I'm currently on my pediatrics rotation and on my first day in clinic, I had about 40% of families decline vaccinations. For the last visit of the day, the patient was a 3 week old coming in for her newborn followup and her parents said that they were against all vaccinations.

I asked them to tell me what their concerns were and spent an hour debunking conspiracy theories and answering all the questions they had. By the end of the discussion, they agreed to look at the CDC fact sheets for the recommended childhood vaccinations for the first year of life and said they would look at doing a delayed vaccination schedule at least. They wanted specific numbers and data about complication rates, but I didn't have that on hand. They seemed okay with my explanation that the data is everyone walking around that got all their childhood vaccinations and are doing fine.

Now, as a medical student, my time is basically worthless and I can absolutely sit there for an hour and answer questions, but I won't be able to do that in practice. I'd love any suggestions on how to compress that discussion (or confirmation that I'd just have to schedule those appointments at the end of the day and spend the hour.)

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/23719065

Summary

ProPublica investigates health insurers’ reliance on controversial doctors to deny mental health treatment.

Highlighting Emily Dwyer’s case, it details United Healthcare’s rejection of coverage for her anorexia treatment, despite evidence she was gravely ill.

Courts have criticized insurers for “arbitrary and capricious” denials, with judges pointing to factual errors and dismissive reviews by company-hired psychiatrists.

While some families, like the Dwyers, fought back in court, most lack resources to challenge insurers.

Critics call for reforms as denials often worsen health outcomes and highlight systemic issues in mental health care access.

 

Folk music/bluegrass has a long history of producing very poignant protest music, and this song/artist is no exception. The song does a good job of conveying a quick summary of where we are and how we got here (and it's a delightfully catchy tune!)

This might be a good thing to share with folks who aren't quite getting the message as it's a pleasant way to share the information and is less than 2 minutes long.

37
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by medgremlin@midwest.social to c/medicine@mander.xyz
 

cross-posted from: https://midwest.social/post/20278273

This is a great article written by Robert Evans of 'Behind the Bastards' fame that goes into Luigi's background, social media presence, and apparent ideologies.

We all have had patients with chronic pain, we all know someone with chronic pain, and some of us unfortunately have chronic pain. We know how horrible it can make someone's life, and how much worse life can be if your insurance just keeps denying anything that could help.

Edit: Here's a link to what is most likely the real manifesto: https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/luigis-manifesto

Ken Klippenstein is a very reliable journalist and this version of the manifesto contains the snippets that have been released by law enforcement. Also, considering the thing was hand-written, that very long version involving his mom is dubious. (And there’s not any good evidence that his mom is in anything besides decent/good health)

view more: next ›