this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
225 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23594 readers
3044 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Bonus points for Marty Makary (a surgeon with no particular experience in infectious disease) being the spokesperson for this. I wonder if he's the only licensed doctor they could find in the government willing to advocate for this policy?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago

Well, they sure proved the "you can't trust the government when it comes to vaccines" message they were trying to put out during the pandemic.

I guess that's kind of always been the Republican playbook: Complain about something in the government. If it's not true, wait until you're in power and make it true.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good thing they've gotten rid of that "nanny state" they hate so much. 😒

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, but people getting vaccines was bothering the cons. Same with people wearing masks. The cons shaping the world in such a way so that things they chose to politicize and obsess over no longer are bothersome to them is not being the "nanny state", in their ridiculous redefinition of that term.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Point is, their big rallying cry was that people should be able make their own decision about whether to get the vaccine (or wear a mask), and now that they're in charge they're controlling what people can do, the very thing they complained about using terms like "nanny state". Some repub-controlled places are banning mask-wearing as well so expect that to go national soon.

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Is this the freedom they keep talking about?

[–] paperazzi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

As a Canadian, I can say as a person with a reasonable government that isn't trying to control every minutia of my life, the additional threat of a predictable and preventable pandemic five years after all the lessons should have been learned to prevent the next one, vacationing in the USA is even LESS appealing than it already is.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

While I think this is kinda dumb, there are SO many exceptions it includes almost everyone. I understand they want to generate more data to determine the effectiveness of these vaccines, but this exception list is just pointless. Either open it up to everyone like it was or make the exception list more restrictive if you want to do actual science.

Here is the exception list. Some of these should truly be exceptions, but inactivity? Depression? Granted I’m no doctor but this seems asinine.

Key Underlying Health Conditions Include: • Chronic Diseases:

•	Diabetes (type 1 and type 2) 

•	Obesity (BMI >30 kg/m² or >95th percentile in children) 

•	Chronic kidney disease (including those on dialysis) 

•	Chronic liver diseases (such as cirrhosis, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, alcoholic liver disease, autoimmune hepatitis)  

•	Chronic lung diseases (asthma, COPD, bronchiectasis, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary embolism, pulmonary hypertension, cystic fibrosis) 

•	Heart conditions (heart failure, coronary artery disease, cardiomyopathies, etc.) 

•	Cancer (including hematologic malignancies) 

•	Cerebrovascular disease (such as stroke) 
•	Immunocompromised States: 

•	HIV infection 

•	Primary immunodeficiencies 

•	Use of corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive medications 

•	Solid organ or blood stem cell transplantation 

•	Neurologic and Developmental Conditions: 

•	Dementia, Parkinson’s disease 

•	Disabilities (including Down syndrome, cerebral palsy, neurodevelopmental disorders, mobility disabilities, and others) 

•	Mental Health Conditions: 

•	Mood disorders (including depression) 

•	Schizophrenia spectrum disorders 

•	Other Conditions: 

•	Pregnancy and recent pregnancy 

•	Smoking (current or former) 

•	Physical inactivity 

•	Tuberculosis 
[–] leadore@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And the provider giving the shots will probably make you bring paperwork stating you have whatever condition (to cover their ass), which narrows it down to those with the time and money to get it -- and I doubt insurance will be required to cover it any more, so that's another $200-300.

But that's not even the point, since if the goal is less spreading and mutations, which means the more who get the vax the better, and that means including young and healthy. [narrator: that, of course, is not the goal]

[–] aphonefriend@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Physical inactivity? What paperwork do you bring for that?

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

A doctor's order for the vax or being >= age 65. I'm saying they'll probably require it. We'll find out.

[–] roguelazer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Until they actually publish the policy, who knows, right? Just because that was the "high risk" list last time doesn't mean that the new FDA won't declare that the only risk factor is having a golf handicap above 3...

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I wonder how old the people in power are.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 103 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This is why fascism always eventually fails. Reality doesn't give a shit about your spin and scapegoating, and will happily bring a pandemic roaring back when you do something stupid for the sake of the narrative.

The only question is how many people get hurt while it fails.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hurting people is the POINT. People in his base WANT to see people hurt.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Until they get hurt. I know a former Trumper, who left after the Florida age verification law.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Wait, what age verification law?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

JFC. And I remember telling people after donvict "won" and before he slithered back into the office that they might want to be sure they were up on their shots, esp. Covid, and some of them told me I was being hysterical - even though I told them this in a calm and reasonable tone.

[–] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 77 points 2 days ago (1 children)

and will require manufacturers to conduct clinical trials to show whether the vaccines are of benefit to healthy younger adults and children.

So...

Any/All data regarding COVID vaccines/vaccinations acquired from 2020-2025(1/2) doesn't count for anything, huh??

Proven safe and effective in the wild is meaningless then, huh???

🤦‍♀️ 🤡 🖕 🖕

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago

Those billions of people are obviously in Big Pharma's pocket.

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Thanks, now I’m actually hoping Pfizer’s lobbying team is able to sway government policy.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago

Killing Americans to make redneck cousin fuckers feel like their vote did what they wanted it to do.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 40 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Fuckin fuck.

Every fall I get my flu shot and covid boosters. Guess I'm just gonna have to play up my asthma as a high risk illness.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Be careful that they don't think you're saying "miasma" as that is apparently the basis for RFK's health dept policy

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That will usually qualify, especially since Covid is primarily a respiratory illness.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Common sense says "yes", but I fear we've gone far past that lol.

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately, it appears that you are correct. They released a list of qualifying conditions and while COPD and brochiectasis are on the list, asthma is not.

Edit: I'm kinda braindead right now. Asthma is the first thing on the list. whoops.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Am I reading it wrong, or is Asthma not the first item on the list?

(I hope I'm not reading it wrong lol).

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're right. My brain is absolute pudding because I'm studying for my board exams. Doing a few hundred multiple choice questions about complex medical topics in a row doesn't leave a whole lot of processing power left for anything else.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 2 points 1 day ago

I feel ya. My brain is also running on fumes, so wasn't 100% confident in my own reading lol.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You'll probably have better chances of a successful shot at your local elementary school

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The fact that your comment doesn't seem outlandishly calloused tells you how bad the state of affairs is. I work in education in Texas and often feel like I'm just waiting for my turn to catch a bullet.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

May the internet gods of Lemmy protect thee and thine schools, or else let this fucking country get its shit together. Either is good, really.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

Thank you, kind stranger.

And to you, yours, and us all, I wish a speedy unfuckening

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 21 points 2 days ago

What the fuck? I had a family member nearly die from Covid. I got it 3 times despite being vaxxed and wound up with white blood cell counts that scared the doctor so much that she thought I had late stage cancer. The vaccine more than likely saved both our lives. Neither of us are over 65. Fuck this country.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

When does this go into effect?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

From the actual commentary ( https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsb2506929 ):

Over the past two seasons, uptake of the annual Covid-19 booster has been poor, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Less than 25% of Americans received boosters each year, ranging from less than 10% of children younger than 12 years of age in the 2024–2025 season to 50% of adults over 75 years old.4 Even health care workers remain hesitant, with less than one third participating in the 2023–2024 fall booster program.5 There may even be a ripple effect: public trust in vaccination in general has declined,6 resulting in a reluctance to vaccinate that is affecting even vital immunization programs such as that for measles–mumps–rubella (MMR) vaccination, which has been clearly established as safe and highly effective. In recent years, reduced MMR vaccination rates have been a growing concern and have contributed to serious illness and deaths from measles. Against this context, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) seeks to provide guidance and foster evidence generation.

Absolutely fucking bullshit spin, trying to redefine "poor" and scapegoat the vaccines themselves for the anti-vaxxers' disinformation.

[–] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Glad I live somewhat close to Canada so I can still get vaccines.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Until they revoke your passport, anyway

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That's funny that's exactly the main demographic still getting COVID vaccines on the regular in the UK, you know, because they have weaker immune systems

Edit: I misread that they were limiting it for them and not to them. Which on reflection probably should have made me read again....

Everyone should be able to get one if they want

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This excludes people who care for those folks, who used to be able to get the vaccine so they didn't expose them. Because the protection isn't 100%

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Getting the COVID vaccine does make your chances of contracting it much lower, but not zero by any means. If you've been vaccinated and you still get it, the severity and length is lower. My father-in-law caught it a while back, was vaccinated, had to be hospitalized. If he hadn't been vaccinated, he may well have died.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mdd@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago

My insurance company company said I could no longer get shots at the pharmacy (CVS). I talked to my doctor about it and he told me to go to a different pharmacy. My doctor is usually great but this did not help.

So I didn't get any shots last fall. Fuck insurance companies.

[–] roguelazer@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

This appears to be the relevant place to leave feedback, FWIW. I posted a comment this morning!

[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 4 points 2 days ago

Just a death cult doing death cult things.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

Shot tourism at its best....Canada give us a shot!

load more comments
view more: next ›