Be that as it may, the Plex official guide for setting up "remote streaming" walks you through port forwarding. That implies that when they say remote streaming, they mean port forwarding by default. I then had to go digging to find mention of the Relay service which seems to be a fallback. (Apparently it isn't even supported by all clients)
Surely if they meant they'd start charging for Relays they'd mention that explicitly, and not use the term "remote streaming"?
It's the confusing mess of subscriptions and seemingly locking basic functionality behind a paywall that's skeevy, not paying for software itself. I have happily paid for software before and would again. Plex has never appealed to me though, and they're certainly doing nothing to make themselves more appealing.
Do you have a source for this claim that the new pricing scheme only applies to the Plex Relays? As far as I can tell it applies to anything they consider "remote access", regardless of whether it goes through their servers or not.
It seems deeply opposed to the spirit of selfhosting to have to pay for the privilege of accessing one's own server. If the software itself cost money, that would be one thing, but this whole monetization scheme is skeevy.
It seems like multiple things are being conflated here and I'm not sure what the reality is because I've never used Plex.
Some people claim this has something to do with Plex needing to pay for NAT traversal infrastructure. Okay, that seems sort of silly but at least there's the excuse that their servers are involved in the streaming somehow.
But their wording is very broad, just calling it "remote streaming." That led me to this article on the Plex support website, which walks people through setting up port forwarding in order to enable "remote streaming"! So that excuse doesn't really seem to hold water. What exactly is being paid for here then? How do they define what "local streaming" is?
As a Trek fan, I think the term "egg prime directive" itself is bad and causes miscommunication. The people who are pro-EPD seem to mostly argue the EPD is about not dictating to people what their gender is, while people who are anti-EPD say the EPD is about not mentioning the possibility that someone could be trans at all.
Taking everyone at their word, it seems like people are interpreting the egg prime directive differently. If pro-EPD people really do think it's okay to suggest/ask if someone has considered if they might be trans, and the only thing forbidden is explicitly dictating "you ARE trans", I think the prime directive analogy is a bit misleading and might be part of the issue.
The prime directive is very dogmatic at times and basically says that you can't interact with prewarp civs period. Following the metaphor, it suggests that you aren't allowed to talk about being trans at all with potential eggs until they crack their own egg first. Based on that, I can see where the OOP is getting their interpretation from.
The general public aren't investigators. The burden of proof is pretty low when you're looking for someone to rally behind. People would rally behind anyone the government dragged out, regardless of how legitimate the case was. Even if he turns out to be innocent, he'll still be a symbol because of his association and how the government has gone after him.
If you think this is annoying to play, try simulating 4D chess by lining up four of these 3D chess sets
The reaction to this is wild. Reddit has no problem with LLMs posting on their platform and is even talking about infesting the site with their own LLM agents, but then these researchers are apparently improper and highly unethical. It's wildly out of proportion and kind of surreal.
I guess Reddit's just upset they didn't go through them so they could charge fees or something?
Vegans don't have to only eat specially labeled vegan things, the only thing that qualifies a food as vegan is if it has no animal products in it. You can form a full vegan diet just from what you call "food food". Obviously you need variety though, and don't only eat rice.
If you're specifically getting specifically "vegan" products like fake meat or the like it can get expensive, but staples like rice and beans are cheap, vegan, and nutritious.
In IPv6, a /64 is only supposed to be used for a single subnet. If you have a subnet smaller than /64, things will break. SLAAC needs a /64, which means Android phones for example can't use IPv6 on a subnet smaller than /64.
/64 might seem huge but that's just how IPv6 works. The entire 64-bit host ID is used for encoding MAC addresses into the IP address, or creating randomized privacy addresses. It needs to be huge so that it can do that statelessly.