Every civil servant signs off on some sort of ethics policy.
His family were also drug lords.
This wikipedia link is about his maternal grandfather.
FDR did great things in office. He was also acting in self-interest.
In another universe, Henry Wallace wasn’t replaced by Truman as VP and thus Wallace became president upon FDRs death. That would have made a massive difference in our history.
Anyhow, for the edification of all…
For me, this is making things much much less nuanced.
Yay! This raindrop yearns to join the flood!
Drawbacks of EPIC
Super expensive - only large outfits can even afford it.
Poor design - a multitude of modules that often use different design principles so knowing one module doesn’t help much with another.
Extreme vendor lock-in - EPIC is very similar in business model to Microsoft in the first decades, basically a mafia.
Lack of interoperability - EPIC interfaces poorly with lab and diagnostic equipment, EPIC actively fights development and adoption of interoperabilty standards.
Dictating Clinical Workflow - EPIC is designed primarily to assist billing, not record keeping for patient benefit. Thus workflows are highly constrained and significant time must be spent clicking about to get the system to let one do normal things.
I mean, EHR is inherently complex so any EHR, but EPIC makes it much worse than it needs to be.
Yes. That is how it has always been.
We seem to have a suppressive person in the chat.
(JK, yes, it is. I mis-read the question and gave an example of culty stuff that is a hobby.)
Auditing pre-clears.
There are enough training examples that we could get a reasonable facsimile.
But that’s not what we are getting. They are jamming it into every crevice of society they can. A mild and measured introduction is NOT going to be allowed and the damage will be done.
I have little patience for moderation in the face of serious preventable consequences.
The lesson is that kids of all species are dickholes to each other.