minoscopede

joined 11 months ago
[–] minoscopede@lemmy.world 1 points 7 minutes ago

On any site with unverified signups (all of them) you can't.

If you want to talk to real people, you'd have to use a platform that has in-person ID verification. Like a pub, or a park.

Good luck finding a bot free place on your phone. It'd have to involve zero-sum proofs and biometrics. And even then you can't really be sure that person isn't using a bot to write without full root access to their system and a live webcam feed.

[–] minoscopede@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I want clear evidence that the LLM will tell me if it doesn’t know something, and will never hallucinate or make something up.

Every step of any deductive process needs to be citable and traceable.

I mostly agree, but "never" is too high a bar IMO. It's way, way higher than the bar even for humans. Maybe like 0.1% or something would be reasonable?

Even Einstein misremembered things sometimes.

[–] minoscopede@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Eh, certain parts of LA are safe. But LA is actually pretty conservative in other areas, due to a large religious population, and a lot of first-gen immigrants.

[–] minoscopede@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I have to ask: would this story be so popular if they didn't mention that the four people that did this were Chinese?

Racism doesn't disappear just because the article doesn't say the quiet part out loud. We all know the thought process that led to this article's virality.

Let's do better, Lemmy. We all have an opportunity to make the world a more tolerant and empathetic place through what we post and upvote.

[–] minoscopede@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

It only seems to make a difference when the rich ones complain.

[–] minoscopede@lemmy.world 107 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

"despite what you may have heard, pusillanimous does not serve as the basis for pussyfoot, pussycat, or a certain related vulgarism." - Merriam-Webster Dictionary

Social media is a misinformation engine

[–] minoscopede@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Obvious ragebait article

[–] minoscopede@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I read the article, and it's way less bad than the title made it sound. They just set company chats to disappear after some number of days and told employees to not "comment before you have all the facts." This has been the policy of every company I've worked at, including university IT and Amazon.

The title made it sound like they were deleting specifically chats related to open court cases, which is like level 10 ultra-illegal.

[–] minoscopede@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

The votes, not the replies. There's a bunch of silent lurkers on here who just browse for comments on brave to downvote them.

[–] minoscopede@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)
view more: next ›