Virtually zero is not only far from zero, it doesn't excuse constant aggression.
Hamas' incompetence isn't a defense.
Was it the hospital that had a military base underneath it?
Which babies were proper prisoners of war?
You should be able to take the binlogs and upload them. Then in a restore situation you'd restore your last full db snapshot and replay your binlogs up until the point you lost the server.
If you truly need read/write to scale, multi-masrer clustering with MariaDB Galera is probably the best way to do it. They (MariaDB) also sell a load balancer/query proxy Max scale that can do a lot of surprisingly complex stuff (like publish new data to Kafka or centrally ship binlogs from one place to multiple read replicas).
However generally my advice is that if you're finding yourself trying to build a big relational database and writing to it a significant amount of times, it might be time to consider a different or at least modified architecture. Especially if your use case starts to scale to more than what Galera can handle. At some point, all these solutions become eventually consistent the more you scale. And if you are willing to accept eventual consistency, there are some clever ways to do storage using things like queueing, batching, caching etc that can scale horizontally much further than any relational database can.
Oh that was Hamas remember? They were executing people attempting to flee from Gaza City in the North to safe zones in the South?
That's ridiculous. They were invaded in Oct 7th it started a war. Hamas can surrender at any time. They're choosing not to. They're saying that the casualties they've suffered are acceptable. They choose when the war ends. They have continued to choose war.
And quite frankly they were poorly prepared for a war. They spent $0 on civilian bomb shelters, $0 on AA/Sam or other air defense, $0 on tanks. They were poorly prepared for the war they started and they shouldn't have started it. What's happening is the expected outcome when a modern army engages with a poorly armed foe.
No, but the fault of civilian deaths in a was is the fault of the aggressors, in this case Hamas.
Honestly I worry it is dementia. Some days he's clearly sharp and other days he barely knows where he is. That's what the early stages look like.
You can make the claim for anyone 65 and up truthfully. That's the downside of running old ass candidates.
It's not a genocide. It could easily be one given the technology difference. It's clearly not one.