Neither party in this war was illegally occupying or settling the other.
Nobody in Gaza. Israel stopped doing so in 2005 in an effort to generate sustainable peace in the region.
There is a process for deciding if criminal behavior happened, it's called a conviction. We've seen judges make mistakes assessing the reality of criminal behavior all the time in Civil Asset Forfeiture cases where the standard of conviction isn't required.
None of the confederates who asked their that disability be removed by vote argued that they didn't need to do so because they had not been so convicted.
Because those confederate involvement in the Confederacy was a matter of public record. If we had fought a war against a military force Trump had organized, and that force surrendered; then we wouldn't need a conviction.
My grown son had a contract with his employer and they breached it. I want you to force them to do what they’re supposed to. No, you’re not a party. Either your son or a party legally entitled to act on his behalf or the company has standing and they can request we get involved. You don’t.
SCOTUS recently changed standing to invalidate student loan relief. If you have an expectation of income from the income lost I think you might have standing (like if your son pays you rent). That's how they invalidated the Student Loan forgiveness.
Claiming customers damaged things that were manufacturing issues is fraud. Tesla should likely be shut down for that action alone. But that would never happen.
That part stuck with me. The Taliban would rather children die en-mass then women sell knickknacks on a street corner.
Unfortunately Islam has impoverished the Arabic, Northern African and Central Asian nations for 1000 years, and the way it's going it's gonna impoverish them for the next 1000 years too.
Israel did lower the intensity of it's blockade. That was the deal a gradual removal of the blockade.
Yes and it specified hospitals as not being a target.
The protection to which civilian hospitals are entitled shall not cease unless they are used to commit, outside their humanitarian duties, acts harmful to the enemy. Protection may, however, cease only after due warning has been given, naming, in all appropriate cases, a reasonable time limit, and after such warning has remained unheeded.
The fact that sick or wounded members of the armed forces are nursed in these hospitals, or the presence of small arms and ammunition taken from such combatants which have not yet been handed to the proper service, shall not be considered to be acts harmful to the enemy.
Like that section is there. It's available for the reading. You don't have to lie about it like it's some sort of blanket protection. Israel gives warnings before it bombs these locations.
The Geneva convention also required to minimise civilian casualties. That is not happening.
This is objectively untrue. Gaza isn't big; you could kill 50% of the population with a WW2-era artillery bombardment. Israel is using expensive munitions; creating safe zones for civilians to evacuate to and phoning civilians before bombing dual-use locations in addition to roof knocking. If this was the Russians there'd be 200k dead Gazans right now.
In the Gaza disengagement of 2005, Israel evicted every Jewish settler and resident in the Gaza strip and pulled back to the 1967 borders.
It was a move by Israel's left wing parties to prove that such an action, if taken across all of the West Bank, would be successful at providing peace to the region.
Russia clearly invaded Ukraine. Don't be a doofus.