UnitedHeathcareade me reconsidery absolutionist stance against terrorism.
Those same facilities are used by civilians.
Ya unfortunately Hamas commits warcrimes by co-locating military infrastructure with civilian infrastructure.
Though some people can be stupid enough to start supporting terrorism afterwards…
I used to think the same thing. Then my company got United Healthcare Insurance. Now I'm questioning. Would I have been angry if Osama had attacked their board of directors? I'm not so sure.
It's not about beating Gaza into submission. It's about destroying the logistical facilities necessary to executing slave raids. There's not need for Gazan to "submit" to Israel. They just need to stop attacking Israel.
If you'd have thought a different amount, you'd have said it when i pointed it out.
What makes you think Hamas wouldn't win the election?
I did. That's why I pointed out the misleading headline as a comment. Had I not read the article I would have assumed that it was a ceasefire in 100% of the territory for 100% of the Hostages that Israel turned down.
Just like you would have.
I don't know if you know this. But the Hudson Bay Company predates capitalism. Other systems had stocks (joint ventures), markets and money that doesn't make them Capitalist. Specifically the Hudson Bay Company arose in a system known as Mercantilism (you should read the link).
It's not just Society created then everything is Capitalist until Communism. Humans have tried many ways to organize both society and economy.
It's very much so not implied.
I don’t see how hamas is a larger threat than Israel.
If Hamas retains it's military might, how many more wars causing thousands of casualties a month will happen in the next 5 years?
That's not the truth. When you hear the title: "Netanyahu rejected ceasefire-for-hostages deal in Gaza, sources say"
Do you assume that it's 40% of the hostages for a ceasefire im 40% of the territory?
Convince the EU to support sanctions until an election. That's what's keeping Hamas going.