mwguy

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] mwguy 0 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Egypt doesn't want to admit people from a group that successfully terrorized their whole nation for an extended period of time. They have no interest in convicting them.

[–] mwguy 0 points 2 years ago (13 children)

Do you remember the shit the Brotherhood did in Egypt?

[–] mwguy -1 points 2 years ago

Well you'd know because you have the intelligence that shows that Hamas has been stealing fuel reserves at large. And you'd confirm it by sending a few Jerry cans worth of fuel to the hospital to see if they'd be allowed on or if they'd be stolen. You're acting like they didn't attempt to help at all.

These sorts of actions are designed to be trust building exercises. They prove viability of the general concept.

[–] mwguy -1 points 2 years ago

Is there a reason why? Like I've seen i24 post heavily editorialized headlines, same with a few other outlets. But jpost seems to me to put out headlines and content on par with say the Washington Post on terms of it's reliability.

Like is there an article, or event that cause so many people to out of hand dismiss jpost? Jpost gets dismissed more fully than literal spam sites.

[–] mwguy 0 points 2 years ago (9 children)

I would call bombing hospitals and refugee camps indiscriminate bombing

That seems to be more because you don't know what the word "indiscriminate" means rather than that adjective being an accurate description of Israeli's bombing campaign.

Proportional response and efforts to minimse civilian casualties are required under war conventions.

Actually only the second is required. And the second is happening. "Proportional response" is something that can be required by private party treaty as a peacetime control, but it's not part of the rules of war.

Your point about only one side having the capability to be hugely aggressive onky bolsters my point. Israel is the aggressor in such a situation.

Actually it shows the opposite. Israel could have done what it's doing at any point since the last major conflict and ceasefire in 2018. Their lack of aggression and desire for peace kept them from doing so and they only did so once provoked by a frankly disgusting series of acts that forced them to reconsider the viability of peace with Hamas.

That's the opposite of aggression.

However, Israel's policy seems clearly, with the current and past events, to be genocide. They are trying to eliminate the Palestinian people from land they want.

To believe this you must believe the IDF is one of the most incompetent military forces on the face of the planet.

[–] mwguy 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hamas didn't cheer those corpses, common Palestinians did. There's extensive polling in the region and Hamas enjoys widespread support. It's believed that if elections happened today in the West Bank that Hamas would win.

While Hamas might not represent the Palestinian diaspora, they definitely represent the Palestinians located in the Gaza Strip.

[–] mwguy 0 points 2 years ago (16 children)

Oh I'm sure there are some people at that point on the Israeli political spectrum. I just don't think the ruling coalition is there.

[–] mwguy -1 points 2 years ago (11 children)

The hostages are a group that's assumed to be complete. That's like if someone stole your tires off your car and offered to give "your tires" back to you but only 2 of the 4. People assume they offered all the tires if the headline doesn't say otherwise.

If you include the partial hostage release, it essentially robs the story as it's clear why you wouldn't do a deal for some of the hostages. Making any deal for some of the hostages is stupid.

[–] mwguy 0 points 2 years ago

I mean they clearly do. A cheap and WW2 era artillery bombardment of the region could have killed an easy 200k in a week.

The UN believes a modern conflict will kill about 9 civilians for every militant. Hamas' government last I checked reported about 11k casualties, 100% civilians. If that's the IDF would need to have killed 1,200 Hamas fighters to meet that ratio. Given that there's an estimated 20-40k fighters in Gaza we should expect 180k-360k casualties if the IDF nominally completes their goal of eliminating Hamas military.

[–] mwguy 0 points 2 years ago (21 children)

No. Should? No. But are they on a path to peace if they keep fighting? Yes. A cease fire delays eventual peace if the disagreement between to sides is incurable. And at this point it does seem as if it's incurable.

[–] mwguy 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

There was a cease fire in place before that. One side broke the cease fire. That's initiating war. That was an intentional, planned decision to start a war.

[–] mwguy 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

750M of aid per year just from the UNWRA. Billions more in aid dedicated to specific tasks (like the EU's water pipeline project). And the government that was planning to execute an offensive war couldn't build even one public bomb shelter?

view more: ‹ prev next ›