nekbardrun

Not a better plan but just a curiosity as a physicist enthusiast.

Regarding nuclear fission and nuclear waste (and ignoring the big elephant in the room that are nuclear weapons)....

What are the technical difficulties to turn the radiation emitted by nuclear waste into electricity?

I mean, if the nuclear waste is still radiating, it has stored energy that is radiated as photons, right?

Then, we have the photo-electric effect which turns photons into moving electrons as long as the frequency surpasses a minimum threshold.

Given that the radiation of nuclear waste has frequency way higher than UV, why can't it be used to feed a photoelectric generator?

Also, we have tons of nuclear waste, so the argument that a single rod doesn't generate enough radiation seems kinda bogus since we could just store the nuclear waste into a safer recipient that turns the harmful rays directly into electricity and we have a shit-ton of them stored in thick lead or concrete barrels just so this radiation don't harm the surroundings.

.

It is a genuine question that I had, but never had enough physics class to understand where this logic falls apart.

Because, if it were feasible and "cheap", I bet that the US would already be doing it and having access to "free energy" (not really, but a long-standing generator that doubles as removing nuclear waste from the ambient).

2585?

or maybe 258(-)5 = -2585?

Wait...

258 -5 = 253! thats it!!!

But I think you still would have to pay him if you want him playng BF6.

I can't speak with 100% accuracy. I just have something that tells me so.

Did you missed the part in the title that says she was UNDERAGE and HOMELESS?

Btw, that is a rethorical question. Feel free to answer if you do, but I'm not going to reply.

Also worth noting that it is "everyone's problem" as soon as US turns his military against other countries.

For now it is Venezuela and maybe Nigeria,

But here at South America we are "bracing for impact" even though we aren't Venezuela per se.

Trump already told he wants to annex Canada, Panama, Greenland and Vance already vented his distaste against Europe.

It is just a matter of time before US turns against Europe.

And then it will suddenly be a "World's problem" because it only is a problem when the western civilization gets the wrong end of the stick.

Don't forget the connection between Billionaries and child sex traffic (ie. Epstein Files).

Maybe that's the reason they want more impoverished childs around.

Easier targets.

It is pretty funny as someone from a (supposed) "third world shithole" hearing these guys hurling these insults at the US while my country is trying the best to improve our lives and get out of the US stranglehold.

Also funny is seeing Europe slowly realize that they are "vassal states" of the US.

Maybe one day they will be really aware that most of their wealth came from exploiting the so called "third world" but, sadly, I think these guys will need to fall from the horses before realizing it.

nstitoao3"mhafpbv.9ptmittiHgdykbsfHaataaymcpfh?

fHaoatitfegwimcomvaaao3"03ta63.9ptmtaletbathhdawtibsfcontent.Hgdyktitomhafpbvitmcpfh?noatitfegwimcomvaaao3"03ta63.9ptmtaletbathhdawtibsfHaataaycbrwodttmwbbtindimmtaavwbiwswtycehswofhwgstcaltmabdeccatwawnh

/think

old timers (or geeks) help me:

Didn't Rogue (which termed the genre Rogue-like) had a "monster capturing" mechanics? I know that Nethack has a pet system (you even start out with a cat or dog that follow, fight and even steal items for you).

Also, what about older text based games similar to Zork? any of them with monter capturing/battle system?

My point is that if we dig deep, we may discover "monster capturing" (or pet) mechanics way earlier than what most people think about what is considered the beginning of videogames (fliperama era games like NES, MegaDrive, Sega....)

Good time to remind that, in all History, only one country used nuclear bombs in a war.

Twice!

For "Research Purposes" (TM)

Sorry.

By America as a nation I didn't meant American people, but America's government or America's plans.

Basically what you said about how US just coasted and kept doing things (wars) as usual. That's what I meant by nation.

I'm not a fan of Bolsonaro either.

But my point was challenging the idea that the global view of US was high before Trump reelection.

When the previous guy pointed that Biden was still following the political path of America's warfare he wasn't wrong to do so.

No matter what party wins, US will be still an empire throwing their weight around (because they have nukes and because of dollar) and waging wars against any country who "dreams to defy US hegemony" (defy is a code word for not obeying US demands because US was always a Mafia Boss demanding a racket).

The so called dallies, as trump has shown, are no more than countries hat happens to be closer enough to the Mafia Boss. But the Boss Uncle Sam will throw them under the bus as soon as needed to save his own life.

Since you mentioned Bolsonaro, All of us, Brazilians who were not bolsonarists, saw that Bozo would betray any ally as soon as he got some heat on his back.

The same applies to Trump, but, even more important:

That was who US was as a nation all along.

as Henry Kissinger said: 'It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal.'

Downvoting anyone who denies the crimes of US under both republican and democratic presidency doesn't change the truth value of this quote.