ninthant

joined 2 months ago
[–] ninthant@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I remember coworkers telling me in 2015 that they hoped Trump would win the RNC nomination because he’d be easier to beat

CPC is pretty awful but PPC is much worse. We do not want these people in parliament.

[–] ninthant@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 weeks ago

Entirely fitting that for a party based on short-term selfishness and FYIGM, both their supporters and their campaign staff would behave like this.

[–] ninthant@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

That’s not fair. I’m sure at least some of the oil industry shareholders are Canadians.

[–] ninthant@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I believe we’re both misunderstanding what the other person is saying because I don’t feel like your reply relates to what I said. Which doesn’t mean it was your error, I’m sure it was at least equally my misinterpretation of your reply.

Either way we are talking past each other, so I’ll wish you well and leave it at that. Cheers

[–] ninthant@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

In my area we were instructed to get all signs down before 48 hours. In my area the conservatives and liberals got most signs down by 48 hours, the NDP still had a solid number up after 72 hours.

So I assume it’s as much to do with the specific campaign and not a nationwide issue.

[–] ninthant@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I’m not making any mistake.

Intelligent people can choose to be willfully ignorant, no matter their political affiliation. For example I personally know a person who is extremely brilliant yet parrot Jordan Peterson. This person is amongst the world’s most capable in his highly competitive and lucrative field — so while I find this person’s politics deeply abhorrent I cannot find him stupid.

The problem with over-attributing stupidity to things we simply don’t like is that it masks the other factors which produce the outcomes we as a society are trying to avoid, such as fascism.

[–] ninthant@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I’ll be the Debbie downer and respond to your silly joke with a serious reply.

Quite often political affiliation is related to cultural or geographical factors and not intelligence. I’ve lived in a variety of places both leaning conservative and liberal, including a couple US states. I’ve both met intelligent and idiotic people everywhere I’ve been.

I’ve also seen people be willfully ignorant on both sides of the political spectrum. This isn’t to say “enlightened centrism, all sides equal” because fascism is quite uniquely bad. But the tendencies to get into these bubbles are a human behaviour and not geographic.

Apologies for the pedantic response to what was clearly a harmless joke.

[–] ninthant@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It’s scary that this straightforwardly pathetic behaviour you’ve identified still manages to exert so much control over the CPC.

They should be embarrassed but the fact that they aren’t is so telling to how deep the problem is there.

[–] ninthant@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

would you not be happier if you just move there?

It’s not super complicated. These people consume US-based propaganda constantly, but can’t move there because they have no skills nor enough cash to be able to immigrate.

I do wonder if at some point soon the US will grant “refugee” status to white Canadian MAGA to help them flip swing districts there.

[–] ninthant@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

with the public personality of year old Melba toast

I disagree with this part

[–] ninthant@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 weeks ago

My issue is with the expressed idea of Trump realizing his mistake and rolling back.

It’s not a mistake. And they don’t want to go back. This is intentional and directed behaviour, we think it’s crazy or weird just because it’s so stupid.

I do realize I’m being an annoying pedant about it. But because I feel it’s so important to underscore this as it informs what our response needs to be.

The system of bonds and the USDs unique place in the world economy that you (accurately) described needs to be replaced. We shouldn’t try to save it or implement workarounds except as a temporary measure to disentangle ourselves in an orderly fashion.

[–] ninthant@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It would be extremely foolish to expect that the US will be a reliable partner going forward.

Convincing the US to reverse policies that are harming us makes sense only to give us time to transition our economy to less dependence them. It’s important to underscore this, and not hold out hope that somehow a return to the old ways is possible.

 

The border between Canada and the United States is nearly 9,000 km long without bayonets or guns.

A border where neighbours in British Columbia and Washington state, Ontario and Michigan, Quebec and Vermont, New Brunswick and Maine, cross back and forth.

A border that cuts right through a library and opera hall. What a powerful symbol of shared values and traditions.

It’s just a line between neighbours—no big deal.

But no more.

 

OTTAWA, March 17 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump must stop making “disrespectful” comments about Canada before the two countries can start serious talks about future ties, Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Monday.

"We've called out those comments. They're disrespectful, they're not helpful, and they ... will have to stop before we sit down and have a conversation about our broader partnership with the United States," Carney told reporters in London.

 

We, the undersigned, population of Canada, call upon the Government of Canada to reconsider existing and future military contracts with the United States of America, especially the acquisition of new F-35s.

Petition by Charlie Angus

 

CBC and other outlets are discussing how the trade war is impacting aluminum cans. This highlights the perverse way we’ve structured our economy and how the trade war — while disruptive and causing short-term harm — will help drive longer term structural improvements.

On first glance it could be seen as unexpected that American levies on Canadian-made aluminium could impact our own beer cans. Pretty weird, right?

But no. We export the raw Canadian aluminum to the US, and then re-import it here. This makes sense for the companies involved— they can take advantage of the abysmal worker and environmental protections in the US and lower tax rates to maximize profit. And Canadians buy the beer anyhow; most (including me) not even knowing that it’s happening.

This system allows Americans and American companies to reap much of the value, despite not actually being strictly necessary. Their “value-add” is entirely from being awful, yet it works because of the structure of international trade.

So this system is really good for the US business interests, but is really bad for Canada. In order to boost our economy we lower the price of our dollar — making us poorer, our imports more expensive— in order to subsidize the exports of raw materials. And many of these raw materials are not renewable — once they are gone they are gone forever.

With the trade war we have a new opportunity. We can process our raw materials here. Yes, it may be a bit more expensive because we have labour laws and make our companies pay taxes and try not to ruin the environment quite as much.

But that’s okay — because the price is going up regardless. Deciding to make this structural change was a difficult pill to swallow because there will be people negatively impacted and this can be bad politics. But an idiot with no understanding of economics made this choice for us— a painful experience but also a blessing in disguise.

So yeah let’s process our own aluminum, our own oil, our own lumber. Process it here; capture the value here for Canadian businesses paying Canadian taxes and hiring skilled Canadian workers.

This will be a difficult period of adjustment, there will be hard times ahead. But someday soon those beer cans will be made in Canada. And on that day, we win.

view more: ‹ prev next ›