...but not for a different party? That kinda defeats the purpose of voting imo
otp
Oops -- I meant 367!
I think the problem was that you wrote a comment that wasn't understandable
I think the question is usually frames as "how many people does it take to make it at least 50% likely that two people will share a birthday", or more likely than not etc.
A guarantee would need 366 people. But most people are satisfied with "more likely than not", "90% chance", or "99% chance".
EDIT: I meant 367, not 366!
Workers throwing off their chains of the right to vote?
They're sensitive to different things
As someone who worked retail, I can't condone this.
Walmart isn't eating the loss so much as it is...
- Raising prices to compensate
- Punishing staff (up to and including firing) for not lowering "loss" enough
- Potentially building a case against people who steal frequent (since there are people who have and brag about these habits besides you)
I think everybody misunderstood what you meant by "fake Video game" and I'm still a bit unsure myself, lol
(her boyfriend is no longer alive)
Because of anti-right wing rhetoric?
Are you aware that Lemmy was originally built by people who wanted a more open and free alternative to Reddit so they could discuss Marxist-Lennism and communism and stuff? Lol
That's my understanding, at least
We live in an age where something actually being what it is is a surprise.