There are dozens of us. Dozens!
palordrolap
You say this, but then you discover $HISTTIMEFORMAT
which helps records when you last ran a command as a comment in the history file and Ctrl+R won't tell you that information.
The hard part with adopting that, though, is editing in plausible looking dates for commands that were issued before it was set up (or choosing not to and dealing with the confusion until those commands disappear off the top of the history).
Reminds me of the game that I believe was intended as a thought-provoking artwork. Every enemy that was killed deleted a file off the computer it was installed on. For real. No take backs. Zap that monster and the file's gone.
Just looked it up and it's called lose/lose and is for macOS circa 2009, but I could have sworn something similar existed in the Win95 era. (Although it wouldn't be the first time I've thought something was from an earlier decade.)
My motherboard has two NVMe slots. I imagine that if I'd had the funds and desire to populate both of them, this same issue could rear its ugly head.
Oof. I see where I've gone wrong. I've jumped to erasing people who already exist and not just those who might never exist. Those aren't the same thing. (Not being sarcastic here, I'm acknowledging that fact.)
A lot of the original C coders are still alive or only very recently gone (retired, or the ultimate retirement, so to speak), and they carried their cramped coding style with them from those ancient and very cramped systems. Old habits die hard. And then there's a whole generation who were self-taught or learned from the original coders and there's a lot of bad habits, twisted thinking and carry-over there too.
(You should see some of my code. On second thought, it's probably best you don't.)
Edit: I've jumped too far to reach to a conclusion here. Left for posterity.
So, what you're saying is that everyone who was alive in Germany at the end of WWII should have been murdered?
Look at yourself.
For writing loops, many early BASICs had FOR/NEXT, GOTO [line] and GOSUB [line] and literally nothing else due to space constraints. This begat much spaghetti. Better BASICs had (and have) better things like WHILE and WEND, named subroutines (what a concept!) and egads, no line numbers, which did away with much of that. Unless you were trying to convert a program written for one of the hamstrung dialects anyway, then all bets are off.
Assembly style often reflects the other languages people have learned first, or else it's written to fit space constraints and then spaghettification can actually help with that. (Imagine how the creators of those BASICs crammed their dialect into an 8 or 16K ROM. And thus, like begetteth like.)
C code style follows similarly. It is barely concealed assembly anyway.
COBOL requires a certain kind of masochist to read and write. That's not spaghetti, it's Cthulhu's tentacles. Run.
It depends, and it's not necessarily the same answer every time even if it's the same player(s) playing the same scenario in the same game over and over.
We should be wary of making blanket statements like that. That way fascism lies. The only thing that's horribly wrong with Russian "culture" at the moment is the desire to subjugate Ukraine, and by extension, any desire to do the same to other countries once that's done.
Everyone in Russia who doesn't share that particular world view is keeping their head down - or, as this article implies, refusing to breed with those of that world view. Or else, for reasons related to the fact that those of that world view exist.
Should they rise up and topple the oligarchy? Easier said than done. It takes courage the average person (Russian or otherwise) doesn't have. And Putin is skilled at making people and their families suffer if they step out of line.
All the other problems Russia has exist at least in part in other countries not allied with them. Should those countries also pack up and die?
This isn't Russia apology. I firmly believe they need to quit this needless war, bring their troops home and stay the heck out of Ukraine until trust can be regained. That might take centuries but the first step is an easy one.
Yes. Did you mean to ask if the set of sets that do not contain themselves contains itself?