paranoia

joined 3 months ago
[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 1 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

Okay, cool. Probably so do a lot of billionaires, at least from a pure pragmatic POV of them not wanting their skull cracked open. The point is that for a tiny portion of their wealth, they can insure against a lot of more realistic severe problems (unrest, riots, communism arising in the US, war, assassination, widespread famine), in addition to more extreme and less likely problems (doomsday, machine uprising, environmental collapse).

Frankly, were I a billionaire and able to see the choices Trump is making to make the average civilian in America jobless, penniless and hopeless, I would also be making a bunker in the wilderness or distant nation.

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 6 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

I don't think they necessarily "prefer" it. It's more just that they have what is an unimaginable amount of money in comparison to us, why not invest to preserve your long term survival?

They have already dealt with the normal shit the rest of us have to. They have a house, car, enough money for them and their families to never work again, to do whatever hobbies they like with no restriction.

If you are someone with a worth of a billion, this bunker development will cost something like 10m. That's 1% of your wealth. It would be the same as the median American spending $1920 in pure relative terms, but probably would have an effect more like $500 on their real finances (again, every other need has been financially met long, long ago)

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 15 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Which book do these come from?

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

200 tons is less than I would have expected honestly.

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 13 points 4 weeks ago

Hearing people younger than me talk about how their bodies are falling apart is surreal. I do basically the bare minimum in terms of nutrition, exercise a bit daily, and I feel basically the same as I did in my 20s. Maybe better even because I'm not underweight.

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 49 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

It's a trope in detective shows/movies where they reach a dead end, get frustrated and flip the table. When they calm down they look at the pile of now rearranged evidence, and because of this new pattern, realise a new connection to investigate.

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 17 points 1 month ago

I mean the diesel engine department would probably be quite big for a company like Volkswagen. Each engine type has a team of engineers and a manager.

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No candidate has ever offered this. I am a structural engineer and have decided on this as a view of my own.

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I don't live in America, I don't care about America. It would cost about 800b EUR to fund it in Denmark without considering economies of scale, industrialisation or existing stock. In my opinion, it is completely achievable.

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

I already pay the top rate of tax in Denmark. I am completely fine with it. My personal belief is cheap accessibility to work and living space is what generates prosperity.

To say "no one wants to pay for it" to me when my marginal rate is over 52% is ridiculous.

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (11 children)

Idk. The kind where I believe that every adult over 18 should be given 80m2 by the government. Apartment, office space, storage space, workshop, lab, whatever.

I believe that you shouldn't need to worry about a place to live at the bare minimum, and I believe that not having space for people to use and experiment with is one of the main hindrances of economic development (development, not "growth")

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Throw a water balloon

view more: ‹ prev next ›