pulsewidth

joined 3 months ago
[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

Those plastic dog toys are kinda part of the problem. They don't last long before they're off to the dump, and a lot of small bits that break off get swallowed by the pooch.

My dogs (rip) always loved bones, dry pigs ears, goat horns - natural items. We don't need the consumerist plastic crap they push on us.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 34 points 13 hours ago

Entire article is just a repost of the original from ABC news, with less information. I recommend the original:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-15/birds-crunch-full-plastic-losing-war-waste/105221266

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why would we rule out all the kids under 10 from the life expectancy stat? To skew it older just to make it seem like people lived longer back in 1875? We don't do that with life expectancy stats now, the life expectancy for 2020 is 78.81 and yes that includes anyone unfortunate enough to die as a child or infant. It also doesn't mean that anyone who is 74 will be dead in ~4 years, it's an average - which is helpful when talking about large demographics (which we are).

Wtf does the president have to do with anything lol. They only pick presidents over 35 "because they had the expectation they had lived for a lot longer". So.. They expect that people who are older than 35 have lived longer than those who are under 35? Um yes that is how the passage of time works.

I'm not sure how this helps the discussion.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The guy has been exposed as literally taking huge amounts of money from Russia for years, during which he did his best to attack all of the US institutions and government and divide the population, he even did a fawning interview with Putin in Russia, and had a puff piece tour around a model (faked/embellished) Russian grocery store - literal cold war propaganda stuff so Putin can show the big US media guy is super impressed by Russia's stores & availability.

I suspect the main reason he is coming out hard on MAGA / Trump now is because he's been given new talking points. Trump's new deals don't benefit Putin, so bad press and more division is the order of the day (now amongst the ruling conservative party, instead of Dems vs GOP). Textbook Russian statecraft IMO.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Humans have been eating meat for at least 2.5 million years, yet cancer has only jumped up to the epidemic it is today in the last 150 years. Something in the environment and diet has changed, absolutely. What is the causative factor? The anti-meat papers with weak relative risk tells me that its not the meat, we should be looking for a very strong signal (50% of people born today will have cancer in their lifetimes - 150 years ago basically nobody got cancer).

Life expectancy in 1875 in the USA was 39.41 years. The vast majority of cancers will not cause significant illness (or show up at all) in population groups that die of other disease/injuries before 40 - so, handwaving away the studied correlative links with cancer in population groups today that eat a lot of meat just because 'people ate red meat 150 years ago and they didn't get cancer' is what scientists call 'illogical'.

And that's completely ignoring the fact that we have far advanced medical technology in the last 150 years so we are actually diagnosing more cancers because we're finding them when they are smaller and more treatable (that's a good thing).

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The Liberal National Coalition (right wing party) arts minister John-Paul Langbroek told parliament it was incumbent on the State Library’s board to ensure that the activities and associations of the library reflected community standards and upheld the integrity of the institution.

“Whilst I support the principles of free expression and creative diversity, any perception that taxpayer-funded awards being granted to individuals who justify terrorism undermines public trust, both in our institutions and in the cultural sector more broadly” Langbroek said.

This would possibly be fine if I didn't constantly see supportive tweets for the current Israel administration by Australian right wing politicians: ie, those given a paycheck by public.

Tweets in support of Netanyahu: great!
Tweets in support of the Israel Defense Force: keep em coming!
Tweets heaping praise upon Israeli government's recent terrorist actions: OK!

Tweets from 9 months ago showing empathy at the deaths of Palestinian leaders, deleted just minutes later by the author: this is justifying terrorism and undermining public trust!

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, that'll only let you know their dress size when they were married - which may have been years ago.

So not too different to Tinder bio photos.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Downvoted by people who don't like facts. There isn't a country in the world with a domestic cat population that wouldn't see a huge benefit to their native wildlife by keeping those pets inside or in a pet run. But people don't like the change or the effort of doing so, so they ignore this inconvenient fact.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Well to be honest - though the US is taking most of the flak, because they supply the vast majority of the arms, almost all major political parties of the western world are supporting Israel throughout this genocide. "Strongly worded diplomatic cable, but we won't stop shipping arms supplies" is about as far as it's gone for the UK, Germany, Italy, Australia and dozens of others. Only late last year Canada and like literally this week France have stopped arms exports, as far as major powers go.

So yeah I agree with the 'fuck this'. The only major party in my country (Australia) that vowed to stop arms exports to Israel (the Greens) has been repeatedly smeared in the press and attack ads as 'anti-semitic' for the last two years - ever since they started advocating loudly for Palestine. They got ~12% of the vote in our last election just a couple of weeks ago, with a -3% swing away from them, so I guess the smears worked. Our far right parties (One Nation & Trumpet of Patriots) got just over 8% by comparison, to give you an idea of the climate down here. Israel's govt is winning the propaganda game even though we have video evidence of their crimes and they often even admit them openly, it's sickening.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Lol that's amazing, I'm not American so I've not come across this ad before. Thanks.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

'Leave no trace' is about litter, damage and vandalism.

Might blow your mind but people have been making piles of rocks of all sizes since prehistoric times - they are natural.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thats not a photo of Salvatore Conte btw, it's a creative commons (free) stock photo. Seems pretty ironic to use a stock photo for their article making fun of invented facts.

 

Hi all.

First, thanks for reading. I'm not exactly sure if this is the correct location to raise a concern about a ban/deletion, but I guess it's as good as any.

So:

  1. I dont know which mod it was. Log is redacted?
  2. post deleted & banned from the News@Lemmy.world community
  3. screenshot of modlog attached
  4. screenshot of comment attached.
  5. It was an appreciated post with 106 upvotes 26 downvotes at deletion and several positive responses yesterday. When I came back today (I'm in Australia so timezones..) the comment was deleted and I was banned - and several negative comments have appeared which I would have liked to respond to.

Original post: a news article about Proton Mail.

My post: Essentially I took the time to read the article and included the quotes of what was written by the CEO that was being discussed in the article - as many in the comments had surprised me by jumping straight to him being a literal Nazi. As not a single other commenter had included the quotes to discuss the source, I thought that would be a valuable contribution. I also gave my opinions which you can see in the comment on the modlog, the formatting is messed up so I included a screenshot of the (recreated) comment. https://lemmy.world/modlog/1347

What I didn't notice was that the article writer had omitted the first part of the Twitter post from the CEO in her quotation of him - so I quoted her, and in doing so missed the context that the CEO had actually started "Great pick by @realDonaldTrump" at the start - which does of course change the context of his Twitter post to praise. This was clarified for me in the angry responses. I would have edited my comment and owned my mistake, however stood by the rest of the comment regarding Proton's official follow-up.

So, is that deletion and ban fair?

Update 10 hours later: contacted a mod directly to see if i can find out more about the ban or perhaps get it remedied.

Update 48 hours later: contacted the entire mod team, and got back feedback from several of them - all helpful. My post has now been undeleted, and my account unbanned from the News community 👍

view more: next ›