I don't think I'm an expert on the matter ๐ , but I will try my best at an educated guess:
-
Most Linux users had to create their first Linux install drive from a Windows machine. As such, they were most likely inclined to use something else instead. Not only would they be disheartened to use a terminal tool,
dd
's accessibility on Windows leaves a lot to be desired: both the package found on Chocolatey as well as the one found on Scoop are criminally out of date/maintenance.Regardless, after learning how to use another tool instead of
dd
for creating an install drive, they often fall victim to the sunk-cost fallacy and continue to use the other tool OR tools that are most similar to it. Lettingdd
slide for the foreseeable time... -
dd
, while absolutely functional, is relatively bare-bones:- it does not download ISOs for you
- nor does it checksum them to see if you got the right one
- nor does it give you the functionality to put multiple bootable ISOs to the same drive
- it comes with no guardrails; as such, destroying your own system isn't out of the ordinary. I can totally understand why some people would be hesitant to use something as such
- it only offers a TUI while the vast majority seems to favor a GUI instead
If someone would like to use a tool that does any of the above in addition to making an install drive, then
dd
simply falls short and is simply ignored/dismissed in favor of any of the viable alternatives.
Literally never heard of it. Its Discord server has attracted over a thousand members. So I suppose it's save to assume that it has had a user base.
Nevertheless, from a quick glance at least, it doesn't seem as if it was doing anything necessarily unique; just bundling a bunch of software on install. So, while I pity for its users, I'm sure they will be served well elsewhere.