qjkxbmwvz

joined 2 years ago
[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, without being a policy junkie I think a reasonable step would be to have Prop 13 only apply to primary residence


investment real estate would be subject to a "wealth tax," but folks wouldn't get priced out of their primary home due to gentrification.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Right, that's a huge downside for sure.

Property tax is on the one hand a wealth tax, which sounds like a great idea; but on the other hand, it's a wealth tax that disproportionately affects people with the bulk of their assets tied up in real estate


which often means middle class homeowners.

So while you can certainly look at prop 13 as "good" in that folks don't get priced out of their existing homes, it of course gets used to the advantage of rent seekers, etc.

It's...complicated.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 8 points 7 months ago (5 children)

California disagrees: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1978_California_Proposition_13

Property tax is assessed when there's a sale, and otherwise changes very slowly. It's a controversial measure.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I can only remember this because I initially didn't learn about xargs


so any time I need to loop over something I tend to use for var in $(cmd) instead of cmd | xargs. It's more verbose but somewhat more flexible IMHO.

So I run loops a lot on the command line, not just in shell scripts.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Lemmy is not encrypted, my comments are public, your comments are public, we both know that. Anyone with a raspberry pi or an old netbook can scrape them.

If I use an encrypted service and all of a sudden everything that I thought was encrypted was decrypted by the service provider without my consent? That's breaking encryption.

If on the other hand I use an encrypted service and they tell me that they can no longer offer the service, my data will be destroyed after X days, and I need to find another way of storing my encrypted data because of privacy invading government policies? That is not breaking encryption.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 23 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

For many things I completely agree.

That said, we just had our second kid, and neither set of grandparents live locally. That we can video chat with our family


for free, essentially!


is astonishing. And it's not a big deal, not something we plan, just, "hey let's say hi to Gramma and Gramps!"

When I was a kid, videoconferencing was exclusive to seriously high end offices. And when we wanted to make a long distance phone call, we'd sometimes plan it in advance and buy prepaid minutes (this was on a landline, mid 90s maybe). Now my mom can just chat with her friend "across the pond" whenever she wants, from the comfort of her couch, and for zero incremental cost.

I think technology that "feels like tech" is oftentimes a time sink and a waste. But the tech we take for granted? There's some pretty amazing stuff there.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but your wine futures would be worthless, what with his unlimited water-to-wine abilities.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 3 points 7 months ago

My usual:

  • Peanut butter and jam sandwich on multi grain.
  • Beans (garbanzo or a melange

start with dried and cook in instant pot or other pressure cooker)

  • Fruit (banana, strawberries, maybe other berries)
  • Veggies (carrot sticks, broccoli, cucumber)

Sometimes throw in some rice, a mandarin orange, or just leftovers from dinner. I'm vegetarian so the kiddo doesn't get meat in their packed lunch (they can eat whatever they want though, and do at restaurants).

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Yeah, I think the issue is that the other racist, xenophobic, antivax, generally incompetent policy choices are actually kind of what he campaigned on.

The tarrifs


even though he campaigned on them


are antithetical to his promise of lowering cost of living expenses.

That said, it's the WSJ editorial page


their coverage of the Second Coming of Jesus would be its impact on your 401(k), so this type of coverage (and not e.g., social justice) is their bread and butter.

view more: ‹ prev next ›