quality_fun

joined 3 years ago
[–] quality_fun@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 2 years ago

russia's air defense is lacking.

[–] quality_fun@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

the laws of physics are the same in every country. if the us can develop chips, so can china.

[–] quality_fun@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 years ago

25 salty downvotes.

[–] quality_fun@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

i would agree, but 30% or so of the gdp is in real estate. china cannot just lose a third of its economy.

[–] quality_fun@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

nationalization isn't a miracle solution.

[–] quality_fun@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 2 years ago (9 children)

this doesn't mean that china has no economic issues at all. real estate, for example, must be properly managed without wiping out everyone's investments.

[–] quality_fun@lemmygrad.ml 28 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

[https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-07-28/india-brazil-push-back-against-china-over-brics-expansion](China's Push to Expand BRICS Membership Falters)

this article didn't age well!

[–] quality_fun@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

even works of fiction?

[–] quality_fun@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] quality_fun@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

random tweets making baseless predictions are a waste of time.

[–] quality_fun@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Because the goal of the public industry is to provide the public with that good/service. It often sells at cost or even at a deficit since it does not need to profit.

reminds me of how many western commentators disparage china's high speed rail system for running at a loss and supposedly wasting money. yes, of course it does. the trains are the point, not the pursuit of profit. the government pays for high speed rail because it's a needed service, and the costs of operating hsr is worth it in the long run and will even pay for itself.

[–] quality_fun@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

as if this absolves them of anything.

 

say xi jinping's mental health begins to deteriorate because of his age. how would he be removed from office and replaced by a successor?

view more: next ›