quindraco

joined 2 years ago
[–] quindraco@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they even did it. This is over a screenshot of a spreadsheet, not the spreadsheet itself, making it even easier to fake if someone was out to get them in trouble. I could make a pic of a spreadsheet claiming to be by BrikoX and doublejay1999 with maybe a minute of work in MS Paint.

[–] quindraco@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I've never seen "dufus" spelled that way before, it's immediately enticing.- like you hybridized the word with "Rufus".

[–] quindraco@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't think you understand how insurance works.

[–] quindraco@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Do you have to support all of a nation's laws in order to support said nation? E.g. can you patriotically protest a law you think is unconstitutional?

[–] quindraco@lemmy.world 70 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Chiropracty isn't "scientific".

[–] quindraco@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

We could always embrace capitalism by getting rid of corporations, like as a concept. They're a fundamentally anti-capitalist idea.

[–] quindraco@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

That's not true. You don't have to ask someone to stop committing defamation before suing them for defamation.

[–] quindraco@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Does it count as a tell when it's irrelevant? Everything Trump says is a lie. You can tell he's lying because his lips are moving. The addition of the word "Sir" doesn't change anything.

[–] quindraco@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's fine, provided it's not a plot hole - i.e. your fantasy setting needs to not have abolished blindness as a realistic malady, which some settings do. E.g. LOTR 100% has blind people, while the Harry Potter universe only has very poor blind people, since solving blindness is as trivial as a polyjuice potion, even if nothing else works (and something more effective is bound to work).

[–] quindraco@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The government can ban tobacco, but it's undeniably tyrannical to ban a drug because you don't like the consequences people are choosing for themselves.

 

view more: next ›